Money and Markets - Financial Advice | Financial Investment Newsletter
Skip to content
  • Home
  • Experts
    • Martin D. Weiss, Ph.D.
    • Mike Burnick
    • Sean Brodrick
    • JR Crooks
    • Larry Edelson
    • Bill Hall
    • Mike Larson
    • Jon Markman
    • Mandeep Rai
    • Tony Sagami
    • Grant Wasylik
    • Guest Contributors
      • Amber Dakar
      • Peter Schiff
      • John Sheely
      • Claus Vogt
  • Blog
  • Resources
    • FAQ
    • Personal Finance Corner
      • Hot Tips
      • Investments
      • Money & Banking
      • Consumer Loans
      • College Savings
      • Retirement
      • Credit & Debt
      • Taxes
      • Insurance
      • Life & Home
      • Investment Portfolios
    • Links
  • Services
    • Premium Membership Services 
      • Money and Markets Inner Circle
    • Trading Services
      • Marijuana Millionaire
      • Tech Trend Trader
      • Calendar Profits Trader
      • E-Wave Trader
      • Money and Markets’ Natural Resource Investor
      • Money and Markets’ Natural Resource Options Alerts
      • Supercycle Investor
      • Wall Street Front Runner
      • Pivotal Point Trader
    • Investment Newsletters
      • Real Wealth Report
      • Safe Money
      • Disruptors and Dominators
      • The Power Elite
    • Books
      • The Ultimate Depression Survival Guide
      • Investing Without Fear
      • The Standard & Poor’s Guide for the New Investor
      • The Ultimate Safe Money Guide
    • Public Service
  • Media
    • Press Releases
    • Money and Markets in the News
    • Media Archive
  • Issues
    • 2017 Issues
    • 2016 Issues
    • 2015 Issues
    • 2014 Issues
    • 2013 Issues
    • 2012 Issues
    • 2011 Issues
    • 2010 Issues
    • 2009 Issues
    • 2008 Issues
    • 2007 Issues
  • Subscriber Login
  • Weiss Education

Money and Markets: Investing Insights

Latest annual report on Social Security and Medicare

Nilus Mattive | Tuesday, May 1, 2012 at 7:30 am

Nilus Mattive

In February, I explained why the “Middle Class Tax Relief and Job Creation Act of 2012” simply compounded Social Security’s big-picture problems.

And now just two months later the program’s Trustees have released their latest annual report.

The conclusion in a nutshell? Surprise, surprise:

“The Social Security outlook has worsened significantly relative to last year’s report.”

Let me elaborate on that a bit …

Last year the Trustees were saying the program’s trust funds would run out in 2036, causing a 25 percent reduction in payments from that point forward.

Now the number in the 2012 report is predicting exhaustion three years sooner than that — which continues the pattern of consistently walking down these estimates year after year.

That’s partly because the underlying math is problematic due to long-term forces and false assumptions — including life expectancies, demographics, and the fact that the Trustees are now calling for lower wage growth going forward.

But again, it’s also because lawmakers are making things worse not better!

Just look at revenues going into the program:

  In 2011, inflows were $148 billion less than outflows and administrative costs, with $103 billion of that attributable to the aforementioned payroll tax cut …

  And for 2012, the Trustees see an even bigger annual shortfall of $165 billion … with $112 billion of that from the extension of the payroll cuts!

What would it take to “fix” things? According to the Trustees, we could:

  • Increase the existing regular Social Security tax rate (in other words, what the rate would be without the current payroll tax cut) by another 2.61 percentage points …
  • Immediately reduce benefit payments by 16.2 percent …
  • Or find an appropriate mix of each of these two adjustments.

Obviously there are other alternatives, too.

For example, Washington could simply raise — or completely eliminate — the current cap on wages that are subject to Social Security taxes.

And if I were a betting man, I would wager that WILL be the first thing they try to do.

After all, it’s politically palatable for the majority of voters … especially given all the “99 percent vs. 1 percent” rhetoric making the rounds.

Moreover, the case that this cap has not kept pace with inflation will be very easy to make.

No, I am NOT saying these arguments actually make sense. In fact, I consider them specious for a lot of reasons. But I’ve learned that neither Washington nor American voters care a whole lot about what I think.

And, hey, it’s also very easy to argue that Medicare taxes already apply to ALL of a worker’s income … which practically makes this an airtight case to the average voter.

Except for the fact that Medicare is in even worse condition than Social Security, of course!

Again, according to the Trustees’ report, Medicare will start having payment problems by 2024, when it will only be able to hand out 87 percent of the benefits currently being promised.

So what would it take to right this program?

The current 2.9 percent tax levied on all wages would have to go up to 4.25 percent.

Moreover, that assumes a scheduled cut in Medicare payments is going to happen despite Congress’ propensity to not let it happen.

And it’s also based on the belief that the new healthcare reform law will remain in place. Speaking of which, if that law didn’t exist Medicare would only be able to pay full promised benefits until 2016!

Advertisement

So if you’re starting to get the impression that there are many “ifs” surrounding these issues, you’re right.

Obviously none of this is good news for any of us. And because it’s an election year, I expect politicians will try to steer as far away from these issues as possible through November.

But at some point, they’re going to have to directly acknowledge what is already very clear to the rest of us — that the current math related to our country’s entitlement programs is simply not adding up.

Best wishes,

Nilus

P.S. I sound like a broken record but this mess is exactly why you need to continue working hard to build your own inflation-fighting retirement nest egg. To learn the best ways to do that right now, just click here.

Nilus Mattive has been obsessed with dividend-paying stocks since the sixth grade. And after graduating from college, he began working for Jono Steinberg's Individual Investor Group, where he wrote a regular investment column. Later, Nilus spent five years at Standard & Poor's editing the company's flagship investment newsletter, The Outlook. During that time, Nilus also penned his first finance book, The Standard & Poor's Guide for the New Investor. These days, Nilus loves telling investors about dividend-paying stocks in his monthly newsletter, Income Superstars.

{ 1 comment }

jrj90620 Tuesday, May 1, 2012 at 10:58 am

The phrase,”you get what you deserve” is appropriate here.A country where you have a dishonest fiat currency,constantly being devalued,stealing from currency holders.A country where people use their vote to use govt to steal from others.A dishonest “progressive” tax system that rewards failure and punishes success and forces many to take the law into their own hands to find fairness.A govt that spends more than taken in revenue.What would you expect to happen in such a country?

Previous post: The 800-Pound Gorilla in the Room

Next post: Attention contrarian investors: Canada’s screaming opportunity!

  • Sign Up Free

    To receive editorial updates from The Weiss Center for Investor Advancement and Money and Markets, type in your email address. We respect your privacy

  • About Us
  • FAQ
  • Legal
  • Privacy
  • Whitelist
  • Advertising
  • Contact Us
  • ©2025 Money and Markets - Financial Advice | Financial Investment Newsletter.
Weiss Research
Weiss Research, Inc., founded in 1971, has a long history of providing research and analysis designed to empower investors with information and tools to make more informed, independent decisions along with an equally long history of public service. [More »]