Something very unusual happened in the currency market this week. One G-20 central bank criticized another, albeit in an oblique manner.
Market Roundup
Still, in the clubby atmosphere of G-20 central banking, this move only highlights the tension beneath the calm exterior of the currency markets.
The Reserve Bank of Australia kept its benchmark rates at the 2.00% level, as expected. However, its statement showed some frustration with the Fed. The Australians are clearly piqued by the persistent dovishness of Janet Yellen’s policy.
In its monthly statement, the RBA noted that the Australian economy continued to rebalance away from mining and that the recent appreciation in the Aussie dollar was partly due to a rise in commodity prices. The market saw this as hawkish, as officials in Sydney clearly see no reason for any intervention at this point.
|
|
The Reserve Bank of Australia keeps an eye on the Fed. |
However, in a reference to the Fed, the RBA said that “monetary developments elsewhere in the world have also played a role” in keeping the Aussie elevated. The statement concluded that “under present circumstances, an appreciating exchange rate could complicate the adjustment underway in the economy.”
This unusual move shows some discord among the G-20 officials, since the Fed’s dovish stance is creating unwanted appreciation in many major currencies.
The Aussie dollar initially popped higher on the news, as the RBA signaled that it will remain stationary with respect to exchange rates for now. Yet officials in Sydney are clearly becoming exasperated by U.S. monetary policy, which is driving carry-trade flows into the relatively high-yielding Aussie. The 0.8000 level will now become “The Maginot Line” for the currency, after which the RBA may become much more aggressive in its efforts to drive exchange rate lower.
The Fed’s dovish stance is also pushing up other currencies, such as the yen. The dollar fell below the key 110-barrier this week, and it was only verbal intervention from Japan’s Chief Cabinet Secretary Yoshihide Suga that halted the yen’s appreciation for the time being. Suga noted that the Japanese government was watching FX rates with a “sense of urgency” in a clear attempt to halt the yen’s rise.
“Other central banks are not going to stand idly by as the Fed dilly-dallies.“ |
Just as their Australian counterparts, Japanese officials are clearly concerned with Fed’s dovish posture, which has resulted in yen strengthening from above the 120 level to the current 110 mark since February.
With most of the Japanese corporates hedged near the 115.00 rate, the appreciation in the yen further toward the 100-mark is likely to weigh on exports going forward and could wreak havoc with BOJ’s efforts to generate inflation and stimulate growth.
Yet despite the frustrations of Japanese officials, market sentiment continues to favor lower USD/JPY moves. With yield curves in G-3 (U.S., Japan and euro) continuing to flatten, the downward pressure on the pair remains and that means that other central banks are not going to stand idly by as the Fed dilly-dallies.
If the dollar continues to weaken, we may very well see unilateral attempts at intervention as other G-20 central banks try to retake control of currency exchange rates.
Prepare for more volatility ahead as the currency wars are just starting.
Happy trading,
Boris
|
Democrat Bernie Sanders and Republican Ted Cruz scored victories in Wisconsin on Tuesday, setting the stage for the next big primary contest – April 19 in New York. Cruz, the U.S. senator from Texas, called his victory over Donald Trump “a turning point” in the race for the Republican presidential nomination. He is estimated to have won 33 delegates in Wisconsin to three for Trump. Following the New York primary, five other Eastern states will hold their primaries April 26. Meanwhile, Sanders, the Democratic U.S. senator from Vermont, easily beat Hillary Clinton in Wisconsin, but the former secretary of state and U.S. senator from New York still has a major lead in the delegate count.
Dublin-based Botox-maker Allergan (AGN) said it would abandon its merger with U.S. pharmaceutical giant Pfizer (PFE) after new U.S. government regulations made the tax advantage of the deal more difficult to achieve. The move is a victory for the Obama administration in its effort against so-called “inversions,” in which U.S.-based companies buy or merge with a smaller foreign firm and move their headquarters overseas to lower their tax bill. The Treasury Department released regulations this week to stem the rise of such inversions.
Iceland’s prime minister was the first major figure to be brought down by the leak of millions of records on offshore accounts in the so-called Panama Papers scandal, CBS News reports. Officials from other countries were also defending themselves against allegations of hiding wealth, including British Prime Minister David Cameron and the leader of Ukraine. The questions arose about possibly dubious offshore tax-avoidance schemes following the publication of the names of rich and powerful people linked to the leaks.
The Money and Markets team
{ 24 comments }
janet yellen is missing a key part of the male anatomy and has no business being the chairperson. Every time the Fed had the opportunity to raise rates someone said BOO and scared Janet back in her cocoon. She will go down as the worst chair in history and probably will be a zero factor in the coming downturn.
Remember she was picked to ” hold the bag” after the previous crooks made their mess
. . . nothing new under the SUN
I wonder where is Stanley Fisher, the vice-chair? As head of the Bank of Israel he quickly raised the rates (not very much but not negligible) after the 2008 debacle and quickly eliminated the big turn down.
Perhaps she was spayed before she took the position. She does as she is told like everyone else I’m afraid. I don’t think it would matter who sat in that hot seat. Obviously decisions are top down. Perhaps she’s not the tippy top. Surely they must know trillions are parked and have to do with the balancing act.
AMEN to that, frebon! The FED made the stock market the only game in town by driving interest rates substantially below the rate that anyone with a brain would think reasonable, and took away the incentive for people to create WEALTH. They only focus on the expenditure side when they look at the economy, and never at wealth creation. I don’t know about anyone else, but having a huge loan does not make me feel rich. Do these Federal Banksters know how to do any good for the long-term economy, or is their focus only on the next 5 minutes? They have the attention span of a 2 year-old coupled with the intelligence of a donkey.
Dear Charles
You are correct. Since retiring 22 years ago my government has really helped me a past serious saver for 40 years because I believed them when they said “save for your retirement” I am living abroad nw. Now lets see what they have given me oh yes a 25% haircut in the value of my home currency over the last two years so when I buy the local currency it really hurts as its one of the stronger Asian ones and why I cannot figure out. Over the last 10 years they have whittled down my COLA to the point where I get almost no yearly increase. They have driven interest rates so low that my bank pays me a token amount of interest of slightly over 1% and I keep anxiously waiting for the day when they will ask me to pay them to park my money there. Now the none savers have access to my money at ridiculously low rates from the bank to try and help spend my country out of the mess that generations of bad politicians have created and they certainly do not have the market cornered on this. These are people that do not understand credit but keep asking for it so they can buy useless things they can surely live without. As for my decision to live abroad my home country wants to triple my taxes take away my benefits especially hospital care and cast me out. So there my reward for working hard for 35 years and saving my money. Sometimes I think it was a waste of effort and I should have spent every dime along the way and now apply for cheap and easy credit. I doubt if I would live long enough to pay it back.
Well said
Unfortunately Dyan is right. Janet can not raise the rates to bring us back to normal.
But this is going to end very bad and very soon, Because I think Janet just created a currency war. And there is no way US can win, Unless we are willing to go to Negative interest rates. And once down that road we are dead. Game Over!
In a negative interest rate environment, if you decide to short the bonds aren’t you in effect being paid to do it? Jim
conversely, if i own bond funds and rates go down (or negative), am i paying to own bond funds? you tell me.
With the world’s economy still balancing on the edge and questions about the UK staying in the Eurozone and the UK continuing to exist. Auntie Janet may be too afraid to make a decision so waffling and making confusing pronouncements may seem to be the safest course. With the price of oil in the basement and the US oil E&P industry taking it on the chin, President Global Warming trying to stop the sale of relatively clean burning coal to China and India, forcing them to burn their dirtier coal, and forcing US Utilities to switch from coal, maybe hiding from the monsters under the bed seems the best course to Auntie Janet. Oh and Auntie Janet “BOO”!!!!
Ted F
Love the part about ‘President Global Warming’
The international currency wars have been continuing to varying degrees for almost a decade now but may well heat up very soon. It is called competitive currency devaluation much like the 1930’s. That being the case, precious metals will ultimately be the beneficiary. That will happen when all confidence in central bankers is deservingly lost.
Since none of the nostrums of the central banks seem to be working, why don’t they try this…do nothing…just get out of the way. My friends in a small construction business are reporting they can’t get small loans (under $1 million) for operations like building inventory or acquiring new government mandated equipment. They say the local banks are too afraid to take a chance on a small business.
The fed is trying to control a boom bust cycle that is just a normal part of any business cycle. By meddling in this way they are holding up and damaging growth.
That is truly the best course is for the central bankers to get the hell out of the way and let things go. It seems that someone or something wants to cash in while the cashing in is good. Same old story, just a new time and new players.
Should the Fed lower interest rates the price of gold will go up along with the Ausie Dollar. Doesn’t this sound like precious metals mining stocks on the AXE will go up, compounded by both the price of gold and the Ausie Dollar? Remember, you heard it from me first.
Dear Will
Jim Rickards states that the Fed has 300 billion in gold stashed away. I wonder if it is true. Janet and friends with their Dovish hawkish rotating comments have sure yo-yoed the gold market on a daily basis. My opinion there is a definite war on gold and gold now finally seems to be making some headway inch by inch and sometimes sideways.
I have read that at the last G20 meeting, it was agreed to push the Dollar back down and this is exactly what has been happening since then!
It concerned with ideal of community reflex to …..system ………..or thing about wrong math
the money flow in and out system, but it mostly loosed in every pockets , especially …black money …How to call it back? Yes, remedies everyone pocket , anywhere flowed by free
I am still waiting for the Aussie to go down to the 0.6500 as promised by the RBA!
Will the got come and confiscate gold holdings as they did when Nixon outlawed physical gold be owned or held and paid $35.00/ounce in paper money. It was a Federal Crime to own gold. Can they do that all over again? Paying paper money for gold? Is there really gold in Fort Knox or is it empty building? I own no gold but it seems foolish to me own gold held for you in a holding repository where you cannot get at it or receive a piece of paper saying you own so many ounces,etc. Like you might ever get access to it if a run on the banks occurred as it did in Greece. On top of the risk of believing in that a repository can send you your gold on your demand in a gold seizure by bank holidays and new laws passed or Presidential dictate. Takes a lot of faith that access would be as quick as a phone call or demand by letter. Just searching for answers knowing the way the world operates today.I think Greece is a good model to expect to be followed by world governments….take your $60/ week out after bank holiday of a week or 2. Work all your life and end up with nothing as credit now rules the life styles of citizens, and gold repositories, unproven to me to be able to deliver on demand, “or at all,” because of “emergency laws” enacted or promulgated by the government(s). Seems like a lot of risk to me, not really factored into such investments.
dropping interest below2% I thing has a negative effect on the overall economy ,excess speculation and kills retirement income