Do you believe what government officials and experts are saying about the debt crisis?
If so, you’re taking your financial life into your hands.
Just consider how many times they’ve been wrong, issued deliberately misleading statements, or simply lied:
In 2007, they swore on a stack of Bibles that the debt crisis was limited to subprime mortgages.
But the crisis promptly spread to all kinds of mortgages, ripping through giant mortgage lenders like Countrywide, Fannie Mae, and Freddie Mac.
In 2008, they admitted it had spread, but swore that it was strictly contained to the housing and mortgage sector.
But in a few short months, it had enveloped commercial paper, money markets, and nearly all of Wall Street. Nearly every one of America’s largest banks either failed or came within a hair of insolvency.
In late 2009, they rescued the bankrupt banks and mortgage lenders using the $700 billion in emergency capital approved under the Trouble Asset Relief Program (TARP). Then, they ran deliberately lenient “stress tests” on the biggest banks to “prove” to the public that the emergency had passed.
But with the government now assuming liability for trillions of mortgages and other bank obligations, they transformed a Wall Street debt disaster into an even larger Washington debt disaster: The federal deficit ballooned to four times its pre-crisis size. And in the euro zone, where governments had also pumped massive sums into bankrupt banks, the weakest countries like Greece began to collapse.
In 2010, the European Union and the International Monetary Fund put together a sovereign debt rescue package that was even larger than TARP. They pulled Greece from the precipice and vowed never to let the contagion reel out of control.
But within a few short months, the contagion toppled Ireland and Portugal … threatened a similar fate for Spain, Italy, and Belgium … and even raised serious questions about the financial fate of the two largest economies in the euro zone — France and Germany.
Clearly, each outbreak of the contagion, each government rescue, and each new happy-talk pronouncement has merely spawned a bigger disaster, impacting bigger institutions … gutting the portfolios of more investors … and ruining the lives of millions more Americans.
Now, here we are halfway into 2011 and they’re at it again — this time with a complete package of misleading statements and lies that make all previous ones seem candid by comparison.
Lie #1. They’re again saying that the debt crisis of 2008-09 is “history.”
The truth: The core cause of the crisis — the gigantic pyramid of high-risk derivatives — has never gone away.
Quite the contrary, the pile-up of derivatives on the books of major U.S. banks is now much larger — $244 trillion, compared to less than $200 trillion before the debt crisis, according to the U.S. Comptroller of the Currency (OCC).
Lie #2. They say that America’s largest banks have virtually no exposure to a Greek debt default or a broader European sovereign debt crisis.
The truth: All major European and U.S. banks are linked through an even larger global network of derivatives, now representing more than $600 trillion, according to the Bank of International Settlements.
Therefore, even though U.S. banks may not hold large amounts of European debts themselves, they are directly exposed to European banks that do hold large amounts of loans to Greece, Ireland, Portugal, and others in jeopardy.
Lie #3. They insist that America’s largest banks are safe.
The truth: The largest U.S. banks continue to hold nearly all of the derivatives in the country.
Goldman Sachs has $44.9 trillion in derivatives.
Bank of America has $52.5 trillion.
Citibank has $54.1 trillion.
And JPMorgan Chase towers over all others with $79.5 trillion of these potentially dangerous investments.
In total, JPMorgan, Goldman, Citibank, and the BofA alone are exposed to $234.7 trillion in derivatives. In contrast, among the thousands of other U.S. banks, the grand total of derivatives is a meager $9.3 trillion. In other words, these four banks are exposed to more than 25 times the sum total of all derivatives held by every other bank in the United States.
Never before has so much financial power — and risk — been concentrated in the hands of so few!
Yes, these numbers, reflecting the “notional” value of the financial instruments at play, are far larger than the actual amounts invested. But still, the risks are huge …
- The derivatives held by Bank of America are 36 times larger than TOTAL assets;
- At JPMorgan Chase, they’re 46.1 times larger than the assets;
- At Citibank, 46.6 times larger; and
- At Goldman Sachs Bank, a shocking 533 times larger!
Yes, in recent months, some banks have reduced somewhat their exposure to defaults by their counterparties. But here again, the exposure remains massive: According to the OCC, for each dollar of capital …
- Bank of America has $1.82 in credit exposure to derivatives;
- Citibank also has $1.82;
- JPMorgan Chase has $2.75; and
- Goldman Sachs is, again, at the greatest risk of all — with $7.81 in credit exposure for each dollar of capital.
That means that if JPMorgan’s counterparties defaulted on 36% of their derivatives, every last dime of the company’s capital would be wiped out. And at Goldman Sachs, defaults on just 13% of its derivatives would wipe out its capital.
Lie #4. Misinformation about the government’s supersized debts is equally egregious. They want you to believe that, although large, the government’s debts are far below the danger zone — thought to be around 100% of GDP.
The truth: According to the Fed’s latest Flow of Funds report, the U.S. Treasury owes a total of $9.6 trillion, 64% of GDP, which isn’t too bad. But the U.S. government is also responsible for $7.6 trillion in debts owed by government agencies, such as Fannie Mae and Freddie Mac.
The U.S. government’s total debt burden: $17.2 trillion or 115% of GDP — similar or WORSE than that of countries like Greece, Ireland, Portugal, and Spain!
Lie #5. They argue that America is special because it controls the world’s dominant reserve currency.
The truth: Yes, that gives Washington the ability to print money with impunity … press other rich countries to accept its debts … and borrow huge amounts abroad to finance its deficits. But it’s more of a curse than a blessing!
It means that, more so than any other major nation, the U.S. government is beholden to investors overseas — often the same investors who have repeatedly attacked countries like Greece and Ireland. Ultimately, that could make the U.S. even more vulnerable than Europe.
What to Do
First, needless to say, don’t believe government officials. Follow the hard facts and protect yourself accordingly.
Second, if you haven’t done so already, check the Weiss Financial Strength Rating of your bank, credit union, or insurance company. Simply go to www.weisswatchdog.com, sign up, add your institution to your watchlist, and you’ll get our Weiss Financial Strength rating immediately.
(Just be sure to enter strictly the first word of your institution’s name. Our search function will do the rest.)
If your institution has a Weiss Financial Strength Rating of D+ or lower, seriously consider shifting all — or almost all — your money elsewhere. And if you have a choice, stick with institutions that are rated B+ or higher.
Third, join me on my Facebook page, where I post comments and answers to questions almost daily.
Good luck and God bless!
Martin
{ 10 comments }
US debt is even greater than mentioned. Ad State and City debts and it looks a lot worse. California and many Cities are broke.
Martin,
I am extremely concerned about recent articles on “dark pools” that allow brokerage houses & institutional traders to “hide” the volume of their trades outside major index volume. How can this not be considered insider trading (the volume on their own trades being information not available to the common public)?
-David
The main question is how do we constrain and inflationary government. The only answer we have is that the only constraint can be fixed exchange rates. As long as the Feds can print money we will have unemployment and inflation. I don’t hear anyone talking about this. Yes it will help if we have less federal spending but not if the Feds are free to print money. By fixed exchange rates I mean a new kind of gold standard or Bretton Woods arrangement.
IMHO what you do is get your own house in order first – a years supply of food, clothing, heating fuel (my major source of heating is firewood, which is easy to store several years worth), medical supplies, etc. This is REAL wealth. Then let the system collapse. Wait for the real recovery as phoenix rises from the ashes.
The Dow closed up for a 3rd day reaching closing at 12,400. The eternally bearish folks at W must be livid.
Dear Dr Weiss
All of your subscribers appreciaite the transparancy and integrity of your team, and I for one thank you for this. What frightens me is that we have reached an economic treshold of no return, as if we were spinning into a financial black hole. Frankly, I do not believe that any economic recovery is possible. Admittedly, there are a number of good corpoprations in the US and other parts of the world, but they will not escape the devastating effect of a manmade economic hurricane, which wll also affect the BRIC countries. The recession we are currently enduring has proved to be a blow to our protocol of democratic governance; one that has turned out to be a delusion and a scam. Perhaps, the best thing we can do now is to invest in a little farm with a house and grow some food for our families and armed yourself to the teeth to protect our loved ones from marauding criminals who will grow in vast numbers as society breaks down. Yet, I have faith in humanity, but to wipe the state clean and maintain order we will need a different regime than the one we have. As Einstein said “you cannot solve a problem with the same intelligence than the people who created the problem”.
Incidentally, may I have your permission to quote some your citations related to government economic statisics and paraphrases in a script I intend to publish; this information is also available from different sources. Naturally I will duly acknowledge the source of the data. I believe it is important to keep the public inform because we are part of the society in which we live and because it is our right to speak up without being offensive; the latter qualifier is, at times, very blurred. If you accuse a thief or a criminal, are you offensive for saying so? Politics is essentially a game of semantics often defined as might is right; by telling the government, the Fed, the banks that they lie may be offensive to them.Thank you
“Martin,
I am extremely concerned about recent articles on “dark pools†that allow brokerage houses & institutional traders to “hide†the volume of their trades outside major index volume. How can this not be considered insider trading (the volume on their own trades being information not available to the common public)?
-David”
It would be interesting to see a response to this letter.
hiding in the country is weak join the army and work to save your country when it finally decendds into kaos. \
kaos should be quite a way away as we havnt seen it in other places so unpopulated as the us. srilanka maybe. the us is a lucky place because it has a vast land mass with not many people per sq/mile and decent rains to grow food.
big swell heading to fiji this wknd 8-12th of july 2011 probably th best this year will see check online surf reports for confirmations;) I won’t be there dammit will be stuck at snapper with 20000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000 + others:(