It wasn’t exactly easy. But President Trump now has his signature legislative achievement. I’m talking about the so-called Tax Reform.
The self-styled dealmaker-in-chief was finally able to flex his party’s majority muscle, overcoming internal dissent to accomplish some long-sought political goals.
Although Republicans have hailed tax reform as a way to simplify the United States tax code, as a CPA, I can say that it doesn’t look much like tax simplification to me.
In fact, the new law keeps all seven existing tax brackets for individuals and limits tax deductions for home mortgages and for state and local taxes. It’s also projected to add over a trillion dollars to the budget deficit.
In my book, giving tax cuts to corporations and the wealthy and leaving much of the complexity in the tax code should not be mistaken for fundamental or far-sighted reform.
The chart below reports that most Americans agree with me and don’t think much of Trump’s new tax plan.
The new legislation also has a significant impact on policy outcomes outside the tax code.
Here’s what I mean…
It would end the individual mandate under Obamacare, which requires Americans to buy health insurance or pay a penalty. It would also open up the Arctic national wildlife reserve in Alaska to oil drilling.
But as a professional investor, what I care about most is how the tax code impacts the portfolios that I manage.
And for me, the new tax package invokes a big yawn.
That’s because it’s unlikely that the new legislation conceived by the Trump White House and passed by a Republican-controlled Congress will do much of anything to increase the long-term growth potential of the U.S. economy.
If you are looking for proof, consider this …
An awkward — but extremely telling — moment arose recently at a Wall Street Journal “CEO Council” event that featured the Trump administration’s top economic policy hand, Gary Cohn, as its key speaker.
It occurred when, an associate editor with the WSJ, asked the CEOs in the room, this key question:
“If the tax reform bill goes through, do you plan to increase investment — your companies’ investment — capital investment,” and requests a show of hands.
And guess what … only a few hands went up, leaving Cohn to ask sheepishly, “Why aren’t the other hands up?”
The reason few raised their hands is that there is little reason to believe that the new tax legislation will induce much new investment. That’s because most corporate profits are, of course, the result of activities undertaken in the past.
Where are the markets headed? Have you ever wondered what the pure, unbiased, DATA is showing? I know I’m constantly thinking about that, and it’s why I get so much use out of the Weiss Ratings website. My colleagues over there have a completely independent, unbiased, and proven analytical model that covers more than 14,000+ stocks, ETFs, and mutual funds trading in the U.S. or Canada. Best of all, they publish a free daily email newsletter that tells investors what they’re data is showing about trends in all of those investments. You can sign up to receive that critical intelligence here. |
So a broad cut in corporate tax rates is a windfall for what in financial jargon is called “old capital,” and has nothing to do with incentivizing new investment.
Now consider this: Speaking to reporters following this week’s Federal Open Market Committee policy meeting, Fed Chair Janet Yellen said she expected the new tax law to boost her estimate for 2018 GDP from 2.1 percent in September to 2.5 percent.
Yes, that’s only an upward revision of .4% to 2.5%. And that is well below the Trump administration’s 4% target as shown in the chart below.
So despite all the hoopla in the mainstream media about tax reform, the big macro global themes — too much leverage, slow growth and low interest rates — influencing your portfolio remain firmly in place as we close out 2017.
But — and this could be a big “but” if it continues — I have noticed that the interest rate for my Magic Market metric — the 10-year U.S. Treasury — spiked this week as the tax bill made its way through Congress.
Indeed, the 10-year Treasury yield touched 2.47% Tuesday. While it was at this same level in October, the upward adjustment had an unexpected ferocity to it. Indeed, it gained more than 11 basis points in two days, marking one of the biggest such moves this year.
That’s why, in the coming days, I’ll be watching it like a hawk to see if it moves outside the sweet spot for financial market stability. And that would be my signal to reshuffle the portfolios that I manage.
Turning back to tax reform, the biggest immediate winners will be big, established companies that are already highly profitable. Apple, for example, will get a huge tax cut that could cause the company to distribute some of its gargantuan and growing cash balance to shareholders in the form of a special dividend or stock buyback.
And cash in hand is always a good thing to have in a world that’s still going to grow slowly despite tax law changes in the U.S.
Best wishes,
Bill Hall
{ 38 comments }
I guess you would prefer Hillary inspired tax increases to spur economic growth.
Bill, GDP the last 2 quarters is already above 3%! “Experts” said the tax cut would not result in corporations raising wages,yet the day after it passed the senate announcements about bonuses for thousands were made. You need to Stop reading the New York Times and watching CNN and get some original thoughts in your head.
Adding to this discussion with hind sight. AT&T announcing the one time bonus doesn’t increase wages and salaries permanently. Oh – let’s not forget AT&T is attempting to get their gigantic merger approved. Oh and let’s also not forget AT&T just announced thousands to be laid-off. I agree with the assessment of the author – I too am a tax professional. My fortune 100 president/client also agrees, in the pecking order of cash flow decisions, tax policy is far down the list. In poling my fortune 50 CFO/client – who is charged with presenting alternatives for the use of positive cash flow, increased hiring due to tax policy change is extremely unlikely. Notice Cohn’s meeting with executives which many news agencies reported – CEO’s won’t be Conned/Cohned.
Agreed And let us not forget that Trump plant Pai ignored MASSIVE objections to any change in Net Neutrality policy and went ahead to give Verizon and others the ability to control the speed and price of our data. The bill will be in your mail soon.
Nobody’s mentioned anything about the tax bills’ enticement of foreign corporations to move operations here but it could happen – not to mention of course US corps coming back home.
Bill
You opinion poll doesn’t mean much since most Americans, if not yourself, don’t know much about the tax plan other than what we’ve heard from the media. I intend to reserve judgement until the tax plan is promulgated by the IRS in February. Conservatively, I’m paying ~33% of my income in taxes (fed, state, local, property). Any reduction would be greatly appreciated.
Bruce
Interesting article, especially the insight about corporate tax cuts benefitting “old capital” (a new concept for me).
I read as far as I could and had to stop, finding 2 glaring faulty pieces. The first is that it’s tax cuts for the Corp and the wealthy. NO…read the bill. Rates for normal taxpayers go down, child tax credits are up, no fine if you decide you don’t want health insurance. There’s more.The second is regarding the unpopularity with the American People. How do you say that in all honesty without stating that most people are getting their info from CNBC/CNN/NBC/MSNBC, or God help us, Facebook or Twitter, etc. When I tune in to listen to CNN and the others, it’s a parallel universe. It’s all negative, all the time. If that poll was meant to be honest, they would also ask the respondents, “Where do you get your information on which you based your answers?” How do you qualify the answers unless you have info like that? These are supposed to be professionals? All these polls done liek this (all as far as I can tell) are B.S. .
Well, I wonder if you still are negative about new tax bill pumping-up corporation activity BECAUSE of all these big companies giving huge bonuses to their non-CEO employes! AT&T, THIRD FIFTH BANK, Boeing, WELLS FARGO, etc. To me this immediate action by these huge corporations shows how they respond to a bright tax future AND to share it with the “little guysâ€. EVERYONE I meet is shocked to see this-and I know the tax code may not be easier but things are going in the right direction.
Just wait and watch real life changes as this is implemented. Personally I am thrilled to get rid of the Obamacare Individual Mandate-the fear of monitary repercussions from IRS plus horrendously high premiums.
So??? Chris Kebbel
What about all these high corporations giving BIG bonuses to employees-AT&T, etc? Is this not a big plus in not bleeding corps dry with high taxes? NOBODY ever dreamed this would happen! Watch hw real life plays out. Maybe tax code not simpler but at least SOMETHING positive is happening-and don’t forget nixing the Individual Mandate and the hell Obamacare has been!
Try not to be too suprised that this Republican President is enriching only hid 1% billionaire friends at great cost to the 99%. Let us pray that this con artist does not trigger 1929 and 2007 (Both under Republican Presidents) again!….. :(
Merry Christmas!?…..
Sorry Bill, I think you’re WRONG on the impact of the new tax law and it pains me to suspect that your investment advice is being colored by your political proclivities. The many people who take the standard deduction will benefit substantially & spend that money. Small business will hire additionally & grow with the dismantleing of Obamacare, as well as, lower taxes & better expensing rules. Also, drilling in Alaska will help improve necessary throughput in the pipeline to sustain it into the future, promoting America’s energy independence. Personally, I am much more optimistic, but frustrated by the negativism promoted by those (unrespected & discredited) who would bring down this president at any cost.
“What Americans Think Of Trumps Tax Plan Poll” is probably as reliable as the polls that predicted Hillary will overwhelming win the Presidential race.
Intuit’s Turbo-Tax whizzes will get a lot of O/T, but will anyone else benefit? Other than the 1%, of course.
I will,I’am going to save about 20k a year
It’s no wonder most CEOs were reluctant to invest the windfall into their companies. Most of them are pocketing it in pay, perks, and parachutes. So this is going to be a windfall for them. Better Trump get a “maximum wage” through Congress and limit these corporate pirates to a paltry $1M a year! Combine that with a Universal Basic Income, and you’ll be prepared for the time when AI reduces jobs to near zip.
Now wouldn’t that make a grand platform to run on!
Negative, negative,negative.
You didn’t mention that capital investments will be immediately deductible. Seems like a big business incentive to me. And what about the companies already announcing new plants and worker bonuses?
Please tell me where those new plants are being built. I have a couple of grandchildren that need better jobs
Republicans give back to its constituents by lowering taxes.Democrats give back to its constituents by adding welfare programs.That’s because more Republicans tend to pay more in taxes than govt benefits,while it’s the opposite for Democrats.Both parties increase deficits,but since few Americans really care what happens in the future,doesn’t matter.
The “Welfare” programs for poor people are about 1% of the federal budget so the Democrats are not giving much back to those poor people who don’t even vote. Plus Repubs have been in charge of a whole lot and didn’t stop the welfare programs.
I don’t think that’s quite accurate. A majority of the 1 percent are democrats so it stands to reason that they pay a fair amount of tax. The richest man in this country is a democrat, the second richest man is a democrat, all the wealthiest zip codes voted for Hillary, and people in the wealthiest zip codes in this country are crying like babies about the tax deductions that they are going to lose and how they’re going to pay more tax than before. I don’t think that the wealthy are getting such a good deal in this tax bill.
More smoke and mirrors from the Trump government in making sure that more money to those who already have more than they know what to do with. When will Americans wake up from their deep sleep and realize that their government is about as corrupt as it can get? But wait, we thought that before Trump came on the scene, so they will find other ways to game the system and fill their pockets before the whole country implodes from its debt burden.
I do not believe your analysis or those quoted. Most of the public does not follow the details and the media just stick to simple points. This tax bill will JOLT the economy upward. 100% writeoff’s on CapExp. This means no taking depreciation over many years. Fantastic!. Brackets make much wider. Higher rates kick in higher in the income levels! No estate tax until $22M/couple. ANWAR drilling for oil. Now not just energy independent, now to be energy superiority! This means less money to mideast producers, which in tile will reduce USA balance of payments deficit. Much more….What’s not to like! On and up to 5% plus!
The rates reduce
My taxes by $4000.
Daughter has an LLC, the 20% deduction and reduced rates save her $2000.
You hit the nail on the head. Good job. Thanks
Seems to me your comments are very shallow.
First of all, the opinion data illustrate that the administration, the media, and analysts like you have not given the public a common sense view of the new law. Clearly, the taxes of most people will be lower. The fact that they do not think so indicates they either have not followed developments or they have been fed unbalanced information. Finally, I wonder if the survey asked people “Do you agree that US corporations should be taxed at nearly double the rate as key foreign competitors on both their US and overseas operations?†I can’t help believe that 80% would respond “no.â€
Second, doubling the standard deduction does simplify tax preparation for those to the extent that it is no longer attractive for them to itemize. I’ve seen estimates that about 30% don’t itemize today, and this could increase to as high as 50%. On the other hand, it didn’t simplify things for you and me, but it’s not all about us.
Third, I worked for an international corporation for 40 years. In my experience, allowing 100% writeoff in year one and reducing the incremental tax rate from 35% to 21% would, at minimum, have a huge impact on the sourcing of exports on a near term basis and on the location of investments in the longer term.
Fourth, companies will undoubtedly pass on much of the reduction in incremental tax rates in lower prices due to competition. This should positively impact US economic growth and benefit consumers.
Fifth, it should result in many high income earners paying higher taxes, which seems to be what many who totally opposed the law want.
I could go on and on, but I doubt that you’ll spend much time considering my comments, so I’ll not spend any more of my time on this.
While the this law is far less ambitious than the law I would have written and not as good as I hoped for, it should be an improvement.
It all depends on who “most people” are.
I and tens of thousands of New Yorkers and southern Connecticut and North Western New Jersey homeowners will be hit very, very hard. So much so People are already starting to sell their homes and leave, closing businesses behind them and firing workers as I am being forced to do. loosing the deductions that have been a staple of my financial universe, is crippling. There is no way this is “good” for anyone. Real-estate values in the northeast are expected to drop by 10 to 20% ans we are already seeing this start to happen as the inventory for home sales is shooting up as people realize they cannot deduct the costs of living here and supporting the schools and services of these communities. The impact is enormous, and equally insane is the that a Policeman cannot deduct the cost of his(or her) uniform and other similar job related expenses for them and many other businesses, yet, PRIVATE JET PLANES and all their associated costs remain 100% deductible. How on earth is that FAIR. I think the long term hurt here will be huge. Micheal Bloomberg, a true billionaire, who built his fortune without millions from daddy, and knows a lot about money and governments and how business work, has said much the same as this writer. So have many other very wealthy CEOs of businesses throughout the country.
Add to that, the cuts to Social Security and Medicare which my wife and I have paid into all our lives and are now being threatened. So, our income is going down, the value of our house is going down and our taxes are being increased by so much we are forced to sell at a loss. So, I’m sure this is good for some, but it really horrible for many, many, many others. And yes i have done the math and done the numbers with my accountant, this is not idle speculation, this is all real.
You sound like a typical democrat/liberal. Truth is this country has put up with so much disappointment from Obama admin. it’s hard to think positive-to actually anticipate anything good coming out of Wash. May your negativity drown in your egg nog!
Bill Hall would complain if he was hung with a new rope! The tax bill gives companies a big incentive to invest in America, with new equipment and factories, which will give new jobs to many workers; and the increases in cash flow will raise dividends for the half of Americans invested either directly or indirectly in stocks. The limit on itemized deductions will help lower income people while taking more taxes from higher income individuals. Mr Hall gives little detail, ignores the new business write-off changes, the pass through fior small business, and the inheritance tax relief for small business. He must be a never Trumper at heart.
There is nothing president Trump has done or will do that can consider good for the democrats.
Obamacare which was and still is a pile of garbage, the law of the lefties and all the other nonsenses that America had inheritate from this era that left this country cripple are so called “good” according to the democrats.
What is wrong with you people? The president run on a promise that he is trying to deliver, why not give him a chance.
What is so wrong with giving a tax break to companies that are jobs producers for so many? You actually rather keep them on welfare for generations to come?
I am tired to keep working hard to pave the road for those who refuse to make a leaving for themselves.
There is EVERYTHING wrong with forcing people from their homes, by removing tax deductions they have counted on since the beginning of taxation. Here, where we work really hard (60 to 80 hours a week) to earn enough to live in the Northeast and pay huge property taxes in order to send children to terrific public schools, to get good educations and to eventually contribute to the country, we are being destroyed by this. The elimination of property and school and State taxes is forcing thousands to sell their homes, depressing the market so they loose even more, and many, like myself, forced to leave the state, thereby forced to close my business, fire all my employees, probably leave the country altogether after building my own home and living in Westchester NY for over 30 years. Add to that the cuts to Social security (which I paid into for over 50 years) and cuts to medicare, makes nothing about this any good for anyone earning over 80,000 and less than 1 Million a year. I am not alone, I have dozes of colleagues who are all in the same situation. We all have small businesses and built our entire financial structure on what had always been good and true, that we are only taxed ONCE on what we earn. So we cannot deduct these things, a Policeman cannot deduct his uniform costs, but the RICH can deduct their private jet planes. HOW ON EARTH IS THIS FAIR OR GOOD? Long Island New York is expected to LOOSE 39 BILLION DOLLARS, Westchester a similar amount. The government is supposed to be for everyone, not just republicans in the midwest. If the economies of New York and the rest of the northeast collapse as a result, the depression for the rest of the country will be intense. For all of the republicans hatred of the northeast, we contribute way more than our fair share to the Federal government’s taxes and to the economy of the US in general.
Micheal Bloomberg, a true billionaire, who built his fortune without millions from daddy, and knows a lot about money and governments and how business work, has said much the same as this writer. So have many other very wealthy CEOs of businesses throughout the country. And you may think Obamacare is not for you, but all my employees love it and so do most of the people I know, it has been working for them after a bit of a bumpy start, but now is working out well, but that only works if enough people sign up. The old system, before that was totally unsustainable, and all estimates were the it would cost Trillions of dollars over time. NOW this tax bill is expected to RAISE the Deficit by 1.2 Trillion dollars and where are the Fiscally responsible Republicans who thought the deficit was all bad? The democrats were planning on re-building infrastructure with this money and that would directly create jobs. This bill is costing jobs as my company and so many others will have to close down as we leave the state or the country. I guess the Jet Plane makers will be OK, but not a lot of the rest of us.
I too am a tax accountant and I fail to see your reasoning. The lost of some mortgage interest deduction and limitation are only going to hurt the rich. Standard Deductions almost double. Many folks will not need to itemize and will be better off with the higher STD deduction. Those with children will get a much higher Child Tax Credit. Maybe you need to re-read the bill. The rich will pay more and the lower and middle class are getting nice refundable credits.
None of this matters whether we see less taxes individually or not.
What most you forget as CPA’s, financial advisors,
Politicians, and average citizens is the sovergn date bomb that’s about to go off to the surprise to most investors.
Tax reform won’t mean diddly when that occurs and it will.
Sooner than later.
How come hardly any of you guys consider this as comment on what the future holds?
Bill:
The reason that public opinion about the tax law changes is negative is because of people like you and the media. Everything I have read about the details would indicate that a large majority of families will pay less in federal taxes starting in 2018. And this week, many corporations have announced that they are sharing their windfall with their employees in the form of higher wages and/or bonuses. Most smart companies leaders will do some or all of the following- capital investment, higher wages, employee bonuses, returns to shareholders or pay down debt. While none of us really know how this will turn out, what we do know is that individuals and business leaders are much more effective with their spending and investment decisions than the career politicians in Washington.
YOUR ARTICLE SPEAKS LIKE THAT OF A LEFT WING DEMOCRAT
For those who are on paycheck, supposedly lower tax bite starting early in 2018. For retirees, etc., when (if ever, since SSI has remained constant for several years now) will we see any benefit? Ditto anyone getting the various credits (childcare, etc.) Presumably don’t actually get that until paying on 2018 taxes, i.e, spring of 2019??
Let’s say you have three banks in your town. Bank #1 takes takes one third of the tax savings and gives it’s employees bonuses. Banks 2 and 3 respond by matching the bonuses so they don’t lose employees to Bank #1. Bank #2 takes one third of the tax savings and increases rates paid to depositors to attract more deposits. Banks 1 and 3 match this to avoid losing deposits. Bank #3 takes one third of the tax savings and decreases rates charged to borrowers to attract more lending. Banks 1 and 2 match this to avoid losing loan revenue.
Employees, savers and borrowers all do better but the banks don’t see any increase in after-tax profits. Not saying this is a bad thing, and it might result in some economic growth, just don’t expect all, or even most, tax savings to flow through to after-tax profits.
Dynamics different for exporters like Boeing, since Airbus generally doesn’t get the benefit of the tax cut, other than from any of their US suppliers possibly cutting prices.