Energy is big business here in Texas. Just about everyone in the state knows someone in the industry, if they aren’t employed in it themselves.
In fact, energy is big business everywhere!
Crude oil, natural gas, gasoline — our civilization can’t live without them. So it’s no surprise that energy exchange traded funds (ETFs) are also big business.
Today I’m going to give you a brief overview of the ETFs in this sector. As you’ll see, energy is a surprisingly diverse industry.
Energy is big business everywhere. |
Big Oil: Diversified Energy ETFs
Let’s start at the top, with the generic “energy” ETFs. Almost without exception, these funds are dominated by a handful of big multinational oil companies. You know the names: ExxonMobil (XOM), ConocoPhillips (COP), ChevronTexaco (CVX), British Petroleum (BP) and a few others.
Consider SPDR S&P Energy (XLE). Just two companies — XOM and CVX — account for around a third of this ETF’s assets. Vanguard Energy (VDE) looks much the same.
Is this a problem? Not necessarily. Huge companies like ExxonMobil are actually very diversified, operating many different business units in a variety of locations around the globe. Their sheer scale gives them some big advantages.
On the other hand, it’s usually a good idea not to put too many eggs in one basket …
Some ETF sponsors try to reduce the concentration in Big Oil with different weighting strategies. Rydex S&P 500 Equal Weight Energy (RYE), for instance, holds the same stocks as XLE, but only allocates 2.5 percent — 3 percent to any one stock.
Energy Service: Let Big Oil Pay You
Energy service ETFs get paid by Big Oil. |
I’m especially fond of energy service stocks. Unlike the multinationals, these companies don’t own properties or produce energy for themselves. But they do a lot of the work — and get paid well for it. They run drill rigs, perform seismic tests, build pipelines, fly helicopters, and many other sundry tasks.
ETFs that specialize in energy service have performed well over the years. What’s the downside? When oil prices retreat, the major producers cut back on their activities. Thus the service companies can be hit hard. But a lot of their revenue comes from long-term contracts, so they can be worth the risk.
Here are two of my favorite energy service ETFs …
- iShares Dow Jones U.S. Oil Equipment & Services (IEZ)
- SPDR S&P Oil & Gas Equipment & Services (XES)
Exploration and Production
There’s another subset of ETFs that narrows in on companies that focus on the exploration and production (E&P) of energy resources. Many of the companies in this group are the small, independent oil companies that take on projects too small or risky for the big guys to consider. Those that succeed are often sold to the major multinationals, or developed as joint ventures.
Here are a couple of ETFs that specialize in the E&P subsector …
- SPDR Oil & Gas Exploration & Production (XOP)
- iShares Dow Jones U.S. Oil & Gas Exploration & Production (IEO)
Internal Sponsorship |
The Optimum Growth Portfolio for 2010 Over the past week or so, we’ve seen how our readers are structuring their portfolios across all the major asset classes. We discovered that about half of our readers have invested most or nearly all of their money in only one or two asset classes. But that leaves them extremely vulnerable to sharp declines in those areas, even if the declines are temporary. If you could start from scratch to build the ultimate growth portfolio, where would you begin? |
Commodity-Based Energy ETFs
Not all energy ETFs own energy stocks. Some cut to the chase by trying to track the price of energy commodities. In theory, this makes sense. After all, the companies in ETFs, such as XLE, may go up along with oil prices, but not always. So why not cut out the middleman?
Unfortunately, it’s not quite that easy …
Some of the best-known commodity ETFs are fiendishly complicated instruments that don’t always move as expected. Moreover, as I wrote in my column back in September, these funds are under attack from regulators and may have to radically change the way they operate. Some use an exchange-traded note, or ETN, structure that is riskier than it looks.
Am I down on all commodity-based energy ETFs? Not at all. I’m just saying they are not as magical as some people think. Funds like U.S. Oil Fund (USO) and PowerShares DB Oil (DBO) can be very profitable. Just use them with caution.
The Next Wave: Alternative Energy ETFs
You don’t have to be an expert to notice that the world seems to be running out of oil. I’m not an alarmist about this. But I do see the need to look for other sources of energy. So do plenty of other folks. That’s why a sort of gold rush is underway in the alternative energy sector.
The world needs new sources of energy. |
ETF sponsors have created several funds to meet this need. Some are more generalized within the alternative energy business, while others target specific niches. Here are a few examples …
- Claymore Solar ETF (TAN)
- First Trust ISE Global Wind Energy (FAN)
- Market Vectors Nuclear Energy (NLR)
- Market Vectors Global Alternative Energy (GEX)
- Market Vectors Solar Energy (KWT)
- PowerShares WilderHill Clean Energy (PBW)
- PowerShares Global Wind Energy (PWND)
The ETFs in this group often tend to be full of risky, small-cap stocks. On the other hand, their upside potential is enormous if oil prices move above $100 again.
Today I’ve barely scratched the surface of the massive energy sector. But as you can see, if you’re ready to take the leap, energy ETFs give you a lot of choices.
Best wishes,
Ron
About Money and Markets
For more information and archived issues, visit http://legacy.weissinc.com
Money and Markets (MaM) is published by Weiss Research, Inc. and written by Martin D. Weiss along with Nilus Mattive, Claus Vogt, Ron Rowland, Michael Larson and Bryan Rich. To avoid conflicts of interest, Weiss Research and its staff do not hold positions in companies recommended in MaM, nor do we accept any compensation for such recommendations. The comments, graphs, forecasts, and indices published in MaM are based upon data whose accuracy is deemed reliable but not guaranteed. Performance returns cited are derived from our best estimates but must be considered hypothetical in as much as we do not track the actual prices investors pay or receive. Regular contributors and staff include Kristen Adams, Andrea Baumwald, John Burke, Marci Campbell, Amy Carlino, Selene Ceballo, Amber Dakar, Dinesh Kalera, Red Morgan, Maryellen Murphy, Jennifer Newman-Amos, Adam Shafer, Julie Trudeau, Jill Umiker, Leslie Underwood and Michelle Zausnig.
Attention editors and publishers! Money and Markets issues can be republished. Republished issues MUST include attribution of the author(s) and the following short paragraph:
This investment news is brought to you by Money and Markets. Money and Markets is a free daily investment newsletter from Martin D. Weiss and Weiss Research analysts offering the latest investing news and financial insights for the stock market, including tips and advice on investing in gold, energy and oil. Dr. Weiss is a leader in the fields of investing, interest rates, financial safety and economic forecasting. To view archives or subscribe, visit http://legacy.weissinc.com.
From time to time, Money and Markets may have information from select third-party advertisers known as “external sponsorships.” We cannot guarantee the accuracy of these ads. In addition, these ads do not necessarily express the viewpoints of Money and Markets or its editors. For more information, see our terms and conditions.
© 2010 by Weiss Research, Inc. All rights reserved. |
15430 Endeavour Drive, Jupiter, FL 33478 |