Money and Markets - Financial Advice | Financial Investment Newsletter
Skip to content
  • Home
  • Experts
    • Martin D. Weiss, Ph.D.
    • Mike Burnick
    • Sean Brodrick
    • JR Crooks
    • Larry Edelson
    • Bill Hall
    • Mike Larson
    • Jon Markman
    • Mandeep Rai
    • Tony Sagami
    • Grant Wasylik
    • Guest Contributors
      • Amber Dakar
      • Peter Schiff
      • John Sheely
      • Claus Vogt
  • Blog
  • Resources
    • FAQ
    • Personal Finance Corner
      • Hot Tips
      • Investments
      • Money & Banking
      • Consumer Loans
      • College Savings
      • Retirement
      • Credit & Debt
      • Taxes
      • Insurance
      • Life & Home
      • Investment Portfolios
    • Links
  • Services
    • Premium Membership Services 
      • Money and Markets Inner Circle
    • Trading Services
      • Marijuana Millionaire
      • Tech Trend Trader
      • Calendar Profits Trader
      • E-Wave Trader
      • Money and Markets’ Natural Resource Investor
      • Money and Markets’ Natural Resource Options Alerts
      • Supercycle Investor
      • Wall Street Front Runner
      • Pivotal Point Trader
    • Investment Newsletters
      • Real Wealth Report
      • Safe Money
      • Disruptors and Dominators
      • The Power Elite
    • Books
      • The Ultimate Depression Survival Guide
      • Investing Without Fear
      • The Standard & Poor’s Guide for the New Investor
      • The Ultimate Safe Money Guide
    • Public Service
  • Media
    • Press Releases
    • Money and Markets in the News
    • Media Archive
  • Issues
    • 2017 Issues
    • 2016 Issues
    • 2015 Issues
    • 2014 Issues
    • 2013 Issues
    • 2012 Issues
    • 2011 Issues
    • 2010 Issues
    • 2009 Issues
    • 2008 Issues
    • 2007 Issues
  • Subscriber Login
  • Weiss Education

Money and Markets: Investing Insights

Global central banks can’t cut rates quickly enough,
but the Fed can’t wait to hike

Mike Burnick | Thursday, April 30, 2015 at 7:30 am

Mike Burnick

The Federal Reserve can’t wait to start raising interest rates, as confirmed by the Fed again yesterday.

Meanwhile, central bankers in emerging markets can’t cut rates quickly enough to avoid deflation.

Twenty-one global central banks have cut their benchmark interest rates this year according to Bloomberg, often multiple times in a desperate bid to escape the clutches of deflation. This includes major, developed economies like Australia and Sweden as well as developing economies including China and Russia.

The Fed is sticking with its game plan to hike interest rates later this year.

The U.S. Fed by contrast seems dead set on raising our cost of money.

The majority of monetary easing so far this year has occurred in emerging markets, including all four of the BRICs (Brazil, Russia, India and China). In fact, emerging market central bankers are struggling to lower real interest rates as inflation is falling even faster than benchmark interest rates — a curious conundrum indeed!

Real interest rates are a measure of the benchmark rate of interest in a country, minus the inflation rate. So in the U.S. for example, the Fed has officially left benchmark interest rates unchanged at 0.25 percent since last year, but the latest inflation reading of -0.1 percent year over year for the Consumer Price Index (CPI) has resulted in higher real interest rates of 0.35 percent.

This explains at least in part why both the U.S. economy and stocks have struggled recently, because higher real rates are a drag on growth.

In the emerging world, real interest rates are also on the rise threatening growth. Real rates (adjusted for inflation) are higher now than at the start of the year in South Korea, Poland, South Africa and Israel. For India and China, real rates have barely budged in spite of central bank rate cuts.

The result: Monetary policy has actually become tighter in recent months despite central bank rate cuts.

Rather that helping boost growth rates, higher real interest rates are becoming a stiff headwind for global economies.

Case in point: Yesterday morning we learned the U.S. economy unexpectedly slowed to a standstill last quarter with GDP growth barely registering a pulse at 0.2 percent year over year. Economists had expected a 1 percent gain in GDP, down from 2.2 percent in the fourth quarter. This continues the alarming downtrend we’ve seen in the economic data recently, as I highlighted last week in Money and Markets.

But yesterday afternoon’s message from the Federal Reserve was basically business as usual with the sharp slowdown in U.S. growth attributed to “transitory factors.” Apparently the Fed is sticking with its game plan to hike interest rates later this year, which would only intensify the deflationary headwinds.

The only antidote known to central bankers to revive economic growth in recent years has been more quantitative easing (QE). The European Central Bank launched a $1.2 trillion QE program in March, and recent economic data out of Europe has improved.

After falling four straight months, CPI inflation is expected to be unchanged in April. The economic improvement has been reflected in European stock prices which are up over 20 percent year to date.

And just the mere hint of possible QE by the People’s Bank of China recently has sent stock prices in Shanghai and Hong Kong soaring.

The Fed by contrast is playing lone-wolf when it comes to monetary policy; one of the few remaining global central banks planning to hike interest rates.

Meanwhile, corporate profits are falling fast, which is not a bullish sign for business investment and capital spending. Companies with healthy profits tend to hire more workers and expand operations. Unprofitable companies do not.

And yesterday’s GDP report clearly shows that while consumer spending has held up reasonably well so far, business investment was a noticeable drag on growth.

U.S. inflation has now been consistently below the Fed’s 2 percent “goal” for 34 months in a row. If the Fed is so “data dependent” as they claim to be, will they really stay the course in hiking interest rates, or will the Fed blink? Stay tuned.

Good investing,

Mike Burnick

Mike BurnickMike Burnick, with 30 years of professional investment experience, is the Executive Director for The Edelson Institute, where he is the editor of Real Wealth Report, Gold Mining Millionaire, and E-Wave Trader. Mike has been a Registered Investment Adviser and portfolio manager responsible for the day-to-day operations of a mutual fund. He also served as Director of Research for Weiss Capital Management, where he assisted with trading and asset-allocation responsibilities for a $5 million ETF portfolio.

{ 2 comments }

jrj90620 Thursday, April 30, 2015 at 12:38 pm

With actual inflation around 5-6%,that leaves real rates -4.25%.I’m guessing that the inflation rate will rise faster than the Fed raises rates,leaving rates just as negative,in the future.Until the Dollar collapses,it’s business as usual.

Bill Morell Saturday, May 2, 2015 at 10:10 pm

Hi Mike

I don’t believe the Fed will raise its rate in 2016 because of the negative inflation rate and the high probability that there will be no COLA for those on social security and government pensions. That being said real consumer inflation continues to rise in healthcare premiums and associated consumer costs driving the premiums, copayments, deductibles, pharmacy costs, and over the counter medications. Oil prices and gasoline prices are also on the rise, but will have little impact on the CPI/w for any possible COLA increase in 2016. I believe actual inflation on average is 3.58 %, but is higher for those not willing to go to a less expensive medical plan. Also the volality of the stock market, dropping yields on the bond market, and the record history low on treasuries and equities, and the uncertainty of when the stock market will make a major correction or have a crash bigger than the one in 2009 will happen. If the FED raises its rate, it will more likely have a big impact on financials and result in bankrupsies affecting mortgages, savings, etc… Lightning can hit more than twice, but most people still remember, but too dumb to move fast enough. The next crash will take a decade to recover because I don’t believe the government will be dumb enough to provide stimulus to save the same organizations twice. Those who have stock or ownership are the last to get paid from bankrupsies and the ones who own bonds (debt) in those companies are the first to get paid, but it is proportional to how many shares are out there and how much you have and how much is left after the government and lawyers get paid. Those in indexed stocks and bonds and equity are better off than those in the high risk stocks. Just my opinion, and in a better position than most, at least, I think so. Buy low, sell high, but don’t waste time making a decision, it may cost you if you are a greedy and highly optimistic invester. No secret the market has been in the greed part of the fear, neutral, and greed scale of invester buying and selling.

Previous post: U.S. GDP Stinks! Fed Punts! Dollar Tanks! Oil Soars!

Next post: “Short of a Lifetime” Starts Paying Off as Yields, Euro Surge!

  • Sign Up Free

    To receive editorial updates from The Weiss Center for Investor Advancement and Money and Markets, type in your email address. We respect your privacy

  • About Us
  • FAQ
  • Legal
  • Privacy
  • Whitelist
  • Advertising
  • Contact Us
  • ©2025 Money and Markets - Financial Advice | Financial Investment Newsletter.
Weiss Research
Weiss Research, Inc., founded in 1971, has a long history of providing research and analysis designed to empower investors with information and tools to make more informed, independent decisions along with an equally long history of public service. [More »]