First of all, inflation is man-made. It is the wealth-destroying outcome of reckless monetary and fiscal policies.
For instance …
From 1949 to 1969, when the Bretton Woods monetary system was working properly, official foreign exchange reserves increased 55 percent globally. Then from 1969 to 2000, after the demise of this system, they virtually exploded by more than 2,000 percent.
By the end of 2000 — when the global stock market bubble burst — official foreign exchange reserves amounted to $1.9 trillion. Ten years later, at the end of 2010, they had increased another 378 percent to $9.3 trillion.
This rapid growth in foreign exchange reserves can be used as a measure of the highly inflationary policies that have been implemented more or less globally since the end of Bretton Woods. Without a prudent monetary system politicians were totally free to play havoc with government finances and paper currencies. And they made use of this freedom in an unprecedented way of recklessness.
It’s no coincidence that the growth in foreign exchange reserves strongly resembles the currency depreciation, or inflation rates, of the U.S. and many European countries over the same long-term time span.
And it’s also no wonder that inflation is again rearing its ugly head in the U.S., as shown in the chart below.
There are some astute analysts predicting high inflation rates and even hyperinflation. And in The Global Debt Trap I established the case for an inflationary endgame as the most probable outcome of the massive over indebtedness of the U.S. and many other major countries globally.
Today I’d like to go over …
The 6 Most Important Historical
Findings on Inflation
In 2003 the renowned Swiss professor Peter Bernholz published a very practical book: Monetary Regimes and Inflation.
Bernholz’s most important findings:
- “The political system tends to favor an inflationary bias of currencies. All major inflations have been caused by princes or governments.”
- “All hyperinflations in history have occurred during the 20th century, that is in the presence of discretionary paper money regimes, with the exception of the hyperinflation during the French Revolution, when the French monetary regime, too, was based in a paper money system.”
- “Monetary regimes binding the hands of rulers, politicians and governments are a necessary condition for keeping inflation at bay.”
- “Hyperinflations are always caused by public budget deficits which are largely financed by money creation.”
- “A continuous flow of new money into the economy leads to inflation only after a more or less extended time, if the old money is also used abroad.”
- “A real budget deficit cannot be maintained permanently. The government must either reduce it or the inflating bad money will be substituted in time by the good money and the base of the inflation tax will be eroded.”
Let me make this important finding even clearer: Politicians are printing money if they are allowed to do so. No wonder — the government is the main profiteer from inflationary episodes! Inflation is nothing less than tax hikes in disguise.
Given the abundance of hyperinflationary episodes — Bernholz discusses 29 of them — the still widespread belief in the advantage or even necessity of paper money being guarded by central bank bureaucrats is beyond insanity.
Okay, that’s how it should be. Unfortunately, in the U.S., in Europe and elsewhere there isn’t a strong enough public movement to stop the current reckless monetary and fiscal policy. Inflationists like Ben Bernanke are running amuck, without any opposition in sight! Therefore I have to conclude that “binding the hands” is next to impossible.
That’s an interesting finding, isn’t it? It makes it absolutely clear just how important fiscal policy is in the inflationary process. With budget deficits in the U.S., Japan, and most European countries totally out of control since the latest recession, this is a very strong argument for an inflationary endgame in the making.
But this observation also brings up an important question: With budget deficits on the rise for many years, why hasn’t inflation become a major problem yet?
There are two answers …
First, we’ve already had severe inflation! During the late 1990s it came in the form of a global stock market bubble. And after that, as a real estate bubble.
The second answer is taken from Bernholz’s book:
Since the dollar and the euro are vastly used abroad, inflationary pressures have not yet come to fruition. But the course has clearly been set.
Let me close this elaboration on inflation and government debt with one last quote:
A Tough Choice to Make
The U.S. and many European countries have to make a tough choice soon. They can stop spending like the proverbial drunken sailor. If they opt for this scenario, all the money pumping and deficit spending efforts of the past few years will have been in vain and a severe recession will immediately grip the world.
Or … they can keep inflating and spending like there was no tomorrow. If that’s what they do, inflation rates will accelerate and sooner or later we’ll face a funding crisis and a currency crisis.
As of now, it looks like Europe and the U.S. will continue their reckless monetary and fiscal policies. Europe’s leaders have just decided on another bailout package for Greece, the most reckless member of the Monetary Union. And in the U.S. the case for QE3 is getting stronger with each disappointing economic report and each falling point in the stock market.
However, the pressure for QE3 is not high enough yet; therefore I do not expect it to be implemented immediately. But if the stock market slides more than 20 percent, which is what I expect during the coming months, and the economy has a negative quarter in terms of GDP growth, Bernanke will again come to what he thinks is the rescue and print even more money.
And as long as that is the outlook, I will keep recommending gold. Either in the form of coins and bars or as an ETF, like GLD.
Best wishes,
Claus
{ 21 comments }
Claus,
There’s one “fly in the ointment” with your analysis. The U.S. monetary system is far different from that of Hungary in the 1940’s. The vast majority of our “money” is not printed Greenbacks but is credit/debt money. M3 is almost six times larger than M0 (the monetary base). See Shadow Government Statistics (www.shadowstats.com) for proof of this. Furthermore, unlike Hungary in the 1940’s, the largest denomination Greenback you can get today is a $100 bill, which makes it nearly impossible to buy/sell in real cash. Yet all that credit/debt money is denominated in only one thing: U.S. Greenbacks. Not gold or barrels of oil. Now what happens when debts start getting called in as the charts on shaddowstats.com clearly indicate? M3 growth actually went negative in late 2009 in spite of massive government spending! The government can’t print money fast enough to overcome the collapse of credit caused by the entire population’s changing attitude toward debt. Welcome to the new hatred of debt!
Dan
The world has been on an artificial “feeding tube” for many decades. Generations have been raised on this false and non-productive system. To expect change without a catastrophe involves false hope. Parents at one time understood the meaning and value of “tough Love” Business owners and management understood and exercised prudent money management and fiduciary responsibility. Today we have exchanged those values for liberal policies that push problems forward. Politicians never have understood their public responsibilities and the public does not demand responsibility. The only remaining solution is “catastrophe. C. Rumpel, Stoughton, WI
Excessive and imprudent and downright wrong government spending may be part of the story, but dont allow political bias to limit your understanding of the issues. The unregulated free market in the financial sector that created the credit bubble/bust and near banking default and thus the bank bail out and thus the ballooning national debt was a Reganomic policy originally – a rightest policy. This is something that MandM.com are in denial of! The USA may not be in as serious shook as the UK but this is the causal route for a jinormous jump in national debt and thus budget deficit and thus credit rating issues etc etc.
Clarence A. Rumpel says: “liberal policies that push problems forward”.
A lot of our problems are being caused by our gov being run, behind the scene, by the special interests of global coporatism. Gov policy has been put in place to feed the beast. Notice how these “liberal policies” have led to mass amounts of wealth transfered to Wall St, record corp profits, more wars, more wealth rising to the top. This whole deficit debate is just a smokescreen. If it were real, BIG cuts would be proposed for our “Dept of Wars”.
WAKE UP PEOPLE!
This is the result of the failure of global socialsim, it will collapse, just as we saw in the soviet union. Politcians buy votes with new entitllments, which slows incentives to work, People who work hard and prosper are a target for more taxes, so they are forced to respond by doing things that do not contribute to wealth building, Should we invest in plant and equipement and risk govt regulation etc. or buy and sell stocks and commodities where we can get out or be more nimble in avoiding govt. .. All these promises from politicians would be impossible with out fiat money. I believe the old tariff system of revenue was superioir in the fact if the tariff is too high, we benifit from local competition, if too low not enough revenue, so there is a natural restraint . with the present system there is no restraint for more taxes, they will crush everyone to preserve there power.
Please elaborate on this excerpt from Bernholz’s book! It seems he is alluding to Gresham’s law??(SP) Bad money drives out good? Or what ever it is.
6.“A real budget deficit cannot be maintained permanently. The government must either reduce it or the inflating bad money will be substituted in time by the good money and the base of the inflation tax will be eroded
Also a discussion of “foreigh reserves” wouild be helpful. What are they and how do they occur?
Thanks
Clause, although I do have a nagging concern about the amount of money being printed by the Fed it is my perception that these policies are simply a reckless indifference to reality. In the first place Bernanke is a Republican that was appointed by George W Bush. If anything his economic ideology is closer to yours, but isn’t it also true that the United States political system is paralyzed by a completely dysfunctional system. Republicans are far more interested in re-acquiring power than they are in setting America on a sound and responsible course. Yes, America’s deficit is obscene, yes the money printing would appear to be totally reckless but I put to you two points.
The first is that until America stops spending outrageous amounts of money on its military industrial complex, until America stops engaging in pointless wars that achieve nothing it doesn’t matter what else America does, it will continue to pile up debt at a staggering rate.
Secondly, you cannot pay down debt unless you collect taxes. Taxes are Anathema to Americans. Common sense dictates that nothing in life comes for free, but America is still in the grip of the delusion that somehow they are different, some how they are entitled to have their cake and eat it too.
Thirdly, basic economics states that if you cut back on spending, reduce the money money supply then you are going to tip America into a monumental recession, a recession that will last probably for 10 or more years. My perception is that Bernanke is using the only policy tool available to America to prevent this from happening.
The upshot of the whole sorry mess is that until America’s leaders can start behaving in a more adult manner nothing intelligent is going to be accomplished. And also the American people deserve some of the blame. They elected a highly irresponsible ninny not once but twice who started 2 wars and put them on the tab. He also reduced taxes for the very wealthy which is a huge part of the problem. This mess was years in the making and everybody deserves a share of the blame.
I assume you won’t hold your breath until America’s “leaders” behave responsibly!
It is true that there is a certain amount of blame to be shared around but that is not the point. The urgent consideration is what do we do now. As a country we have lost our fiscal discipline and need proven and successful leadership, not politicians to fix it. Otherwise we are just kicking the can. I agree with Ray who makes some excellent points.
Bernake a Republican?!? If the banksters who own the Fed would have put Bozo the clown up as the nominee for the chairmanship, Bush would have appointed him as Fed Chairman. Bush, Obama, Clinton, what’s the difference? They do what they are told and don’t ask questions. They don’t work for us, the US citizens.
Have to agree with Richard Gordon on taxes.Polls done here in California show that citizens only want tax increases on someone else,the rich.What we need is an end to income taxes or a totally flat income tax that doesn’t punish people who are responsible,work hard,save and achieve success,while rewarding the lazy.A consumption tax in place of an income tax would also be preferable.More consumption taxes and less income taxes would help reduce our over consumption,while increasing incentives to invest in productive assets.As long as so many support wasteful govt spending,because they pay little or no taxes,we will continue seeing this demand for more “entitlement” spending.
Some simple ideas to cut spending — perhaps most from Ron Paul;
1. We give foreign aid to over 150 countries. CANCEL MOST OF THIS.
2. We have military forces in over 100 countries. CLOSE MOST ALL FORIEGN BASES.
3. Dept. of Energy from President Carter to get us off of foreign oil has been useless. CANCEL IT.
4, Dept, of Education from President Carter has done nothing to improve eduction. CANCEL IT.
5. Simplify income tax system. ELIMINATE 90% of IRS.
6. Stop the useless wars we are in unless they directly affect our security. Cut Defense Dept.spending to reflect the knowledge of future battles.
7. We are being scammed in Medicaid, food stamps, welfare, etc. We should help those in need but be firm in cutting baby factories and putting people back to work.
8. Medicare is rapidly going bankrupt. It must be addressed. Of course Soc. Security must be addressed also.
9. Cut back severely the retirement and benifits of congress and other gov. big wigs. Reduce staff and benefits.
10. Rein in salary and retirement benefits of all gov. employees. Common sense ditates that life guards in California are overpaid at $100k to $200k. Other cases seem just as ridiculous.
11. Etc., etc, etc. .
Richard Gordon:
You Got It!
Mr. Claus I would like to thank you for your GOOD REPORTS on the economy, makes see things clearer and I enjoy reading most of your articles here at Weiss, Thank you so much for your good advice and information! keep the good work !!!
So how come investors like George Soros are getting out of gold? How come the gold price has dropped about $9.00 in the last day?
Soros is selling gold because he knows its a bubble. That is his business. blowing up bubbles and cashing out before the idiot sheeple get caught holding fools gold when the bubble breaks. I cannot believe how many people are falling for this gold hype and the death of the dollar nonsense. How easily the sheep can be herded into gold, then fleeced.
We are nothing but a spit in the ocean.The powers that be create a problem,then they solve the problem they created.Everyting is in their favor.Every move is to transfer wealth and control population.Like it or not,what is,is.Stay debt free so no one owns you.I was raised with the constant reminder,people say money isn”t everything,but,try living without it.I’m not owned,or controlled.Life is beautiful.
One of the major causes of inflation isn’t addressed in this article. That is the amount/percent of debt free spending of newly minted currency into circulation by governments. I’m not talking about deficit/debt spending, but rather the spending into circulation through the government, not the banks. Ireland has just started doing it, Guernsey has been doing for 200 years. Canada did between WW2 and the early 70 until the Monteraists shattered the largely debt free system. The money supply belongs to the people of a nation, why should the ability to put it into circulation be handed to the banks who charge interest on it? Currently that is exactly what is happening. It is a proven system that is the only rememedy I can think of for the problem.
Ultimately, I blame the institution of government currency. Government currencies (beginning with nationalized mints like the one established in the U.S. in 1792) ultimately become political footballs. Note the purely political manipulation of the mint ratio, silver to gold, to serve the interests of the political faction that could muster the most votes in Congress from the inception of theU.S. Mint. The institution of government currency is inherently inimical to free markets and personal choice.
Until people can select the currency(ies) they prefer through free-market choice, based on reputation–the integrity and financial responsibility of the issuing banker or merchant–AND WITHOUT GOVERNMENT INTERVENTION–governments will remain empowered practically without restriction. They will continue to act irresponsibly, creating wars and “entitlements” that could never be dreamed of without their socialist-fascist powers to manipulate currency purely for short-term political expedience.
The USA are hell bent on ruling the world. Nothing good can ever come from that. Like 007 says, “I’ve seen that movie before and I always ends badly”, (for the evil guy that is), but in this case it will be bad for everyone.
Problem: US foreign policy (police) Solution: CANCEL THE DAM THING!
I strongly agree with Jame’s/Paul’s #1 and 2.
I think US should do the following at the earliest possible
a) Stop aid to those states which are of no direct use for the improvement of US citizen’s lives.
b) Don’t get into regional power play like India and Pakistan, Iran and Iraq etc… You know why? By simply behaving like big brother you are forced to give huge aid to any one of them
c) Don’t venture into wars for next 10 years. On the name of war and security you are forced to spend a lot for no benefit. You can fight later. First take care of own interests. [Protecting self is always excluded]
d) Society as such should consume far less compared to today.
These opinions are purely at a personal thought level