The unemployment rate has fallen below the 5% threshold for the first time since the 2008-09 recession ended, hitting 4.9% for January. But the government reported Friday that non-farm payrolls increased just 151,000 vs. the 190,000 gain expected. Average hourly earnings were a bright spot, rising 0.5% on a monthly basis vs. the expectation of a 0.3% rise. The annual hourly earnings inflation rate increased to 2.5% from 2.2% previously.
This could be enough to encourage the Fed to lift interest rates again in March. We will know more when central bank Chair Janet Yellen makes her semiannual testimony to Congress starting on Wednesday. We will also get another reading on the jobs market when the Job Openings and Labor Turning Survey is released on Tuesday. Friday will bring updates on retail sales, business inventories, and consumer sentiment.
Deutsche Bank analysts expect Yellen to stress patience in waiting to see further improvement on the inflation front given fresh weakness in crude-oil prices as well as the tightening of financial conditions from the recent market volatility.
Right now, the single biggest potential upside catalyst for the market overall would be a reduction in the Fed’s December forecast of four quarter-point rate hikes for 2016. Currently, the futures market only puts a 50% chance of a single rate hike this year.
The economic data we’re seeing lately would certainly support a dovish turn by Yellen. The chart above of the Citigroup U.S. Economic Surprise Index shows where the economic data is coming in relative to expectations. Surprises have almost all been on the downside lately, so you can see the orange line sinking back toward 2012-2014 lows.
This is down sharply from the highs seen at the end of 2015 when the Fed decided, based on the economic data, to raise interest rates for the first time since 2006. Clearly, the situation has changed. Shouldn’t they have known that?
Turbulent Times Ahead! It was during the Iraq War that one of my investment recos could have made you nearly THREE TIMES your money in just one year — turning every $10,000 into nearly $30,000 in exactly 12 months. Another investment in this period rose 196.8%. That why I urge you to read my latest e-book, Winds of World War III … You’ll get the facts you need to protect yourself, along with what you need to do to prepare for this last great bull market. In fact, I’d like to send you a FREE copy of Winds of World War III right away, just click here! –Larry |
Internal Sponsorship |
Consensus at present is that the Fed’s forecast for four quarter-point rate hikes will be scrapped. Paul Ashworth at Capital Economics believes the Fed won’t raise rates until June at the earliest. The decision will swing on outlooks of collapse in China output, a U.S. economic slowdown and weak industrial commodity prices. Stay tuned.
* * *
LOW EXPOSURE
It surprised me to learn Friday that active-investment managers are not just bearish, they are very confident about their point of view. They’re good at what they do, so this not automatically a groupthink that must be faded.
Jason Goepfert, of Sundial Capital, reports that the National Association of Active Investment Managers data shows that the average manager had stock market exposure of 22% through the end of last week. The exposure reported by an individual manager can vary anywhere from –200% (leveraged short) to +200% (leveraged long). When aggregated with all the other managers and averaged, Goepfert says, the actual minimum was –4% (early October 2011) and the maximum was +104% (late January 2013). This week’s average of 22% ranks in the bottom 10% of all weeks since 2006.
The standard deviation in responses — which shows confidence — ranked in the bottom 6% of all readings since 2006. For comparison, Goepfert reports that the last time that managers’ exposure was below 25%, last September, the standard deviation in responses ranked in the top 70% of all readings, meaning they were not very confident in their bearishness. Good thing, too, as the market then zoomed higher for two months before spiraling lower into the current condition.
Keep in mind this is not a gauge of amateurs. While active managers are largely trend-followers, the data shows they were smart enough to reduce exposure as stocks were peaking in 2007, 2011 and 2015 and were aggressively long during the protracted uptrend in 2013-14.
Like any group, however, there tends to be trouble when almost everyone is leaning one way and there isn’t much variability among them, Goepfert notes. As a group, they have had lower exposure than this week’s 22%, so there is room for it to fall further if stocks continue to struggle. That’s what happened during the crash in 2008, but it is not typical.
Goepfert concludes that this is a positive for stocks, due to the fact that the managers are so universal in having low exposure. Even if his recommendation to fade this pervasive bearishness is correct, however, his data further shows that shares are not likely to be vividly higher in a sustainable way for six months to a year.
Best wishes,
Jon Markman
P.S. Global Currency Investor — from Boris Schlossberg and Kathy Lien — offers an incredibly profitable way to diversify in a world gone mad.
In fact, Boris and Kathy won 81% of their recommended trades in 2015 … and they’re hoping to keep that going throughout 2016 and beyond!
Click here to read their new report!
The investment strategy and opinions expressed in this article are those of the author’s and do not necessarily reflect those of any other editor at Weiss Research or the company as a whole.
{ 17 comments }
Jon, if you say a lie enough times, does it become the truth? No, so if we change the definition of unemployment does that just deceive or become the truth? We can change all our economic definitions and we can all sit around and sing kumbaya or just written more nonsense in financial letters and feel everything is hunkydory. Shadow stats for the truth please in the future.
The unemployment figures are for how much of the working age population? How many people have given up or are waiting to join the job search? How many like my sister-in-law opted for the 62 and out Social Security? Physics tell us that both numbers and time are mutable. How many years did it take Voyager I to reach pluto? Yet Voyager thought it had only been in space for a few months.
One third of the people in the country are not working. Probably half that number are worthless bums and don’t want a job. Still, unemployment rate is OVER fifteen percent. Only politicians can do math fuzzy enough to come up with five percent. I try to hire people and they tell me it is a losing proposition for them to work..but they will work for cash.
The Glass-Steagall Act…. Remember that name…… All that we are facing now goes back to it’s removal in 1999 by a Republican Majority Congress and a turncoat Democrat called Bill Clinton (Who also sold us our by signing off on the other Republican brought trade agreement called NAFTA)…..
If you find a political candidate who wants to restore Glass-Steagall vote for them. If G.S. doesn’t go back on the books, we risk an even greater Crash than 1929….. If you are not familiar with Glass-Steagall, go to Google or Wikipedia and read the many articles written on why it is so important to get it returned to law…..
you’re so smart.
Jon, do I sense you still have some faith remaining in the Fed? Are the markets really still awaiting Yellen after jobs data? I think the Fed will raise rates, after all their data is flawed and an election is coming up. Then they could bring them down in December after the election, but certainly not just before the election. But, what is Jon’s forward guidance?
pedro,
You and the other posters are all correct—this market has been rigged as well as the employment #s.
The unholy trinity—the media, and Dems & Rep—the two party political system began to destroy the free markets and prosperity starting in 1913, and 1933 and 1934 the game was rigged and only the elite class could win.
Almost every comment here questions the government stats. Why doesn’t Markman? Much of Weiss Research seems to be based on no research but rather compiled from all sorts of consensus opinions.
We need to ask at this late stage what it is the Fed is trying to achieve. Do we want a high $US so that our companies find it more difficult to profit from overseas trade, so that commodity prices stay depressed and we attract foreign capital as a safe port of call. If oil measured in dollars was allowed to rise a little, this might give them the inflation numbers they are looking for. Why do we allow the Fed to stuff up free markets with stupid quarter point projections on shoddy figures. This continual interference in free markets is what is killing the economy. We need honest figures we can trust, we need capital to be given a chance to rebuild, we need bureaucrats to get out of the way and we need a country that is inspired to work again.
We need Glass Stegall because it separated commercial banks from insurance companies and brokerage houses. Do you think the toxic mortgage default swaps could have been foisted on us if G/S was in effect? Do you think the housing bubble could have formed if the govt(we the suckers) were not insuring these loans if G/S was in effect and a bunch of CROOKS were not running the govt? Did any of these crooks go to jail? Yet they are some of the same bunch who brought down the S&Loan banks in the late 80’s and govt.(we the suckers) insured the jumbo c.d. s the crooks bought then took out loans they then defaulted on–and then collected on the INSURED c.d.s they held and the S&L were declared insolvent by the govt. Has capitalism become so full of rotten crooks that the millennials are now looking elect to the Marxist Socialist Bernie Sanders? I truly hope for a big house cleaning in 2017–that is if we even have a country.
This is Obamanomics at it best. Throw out a third of the working population and claim unemployment is sub-5%. Intimidate avg people, with fines and penalties, into buying health insurance they can’t afford to use, and claim everyone is now covered (except for the 20m that still fall through the cracks).
Well, i for one quit from this world… There are no jobs, no prospects, no hope!
Try traveling the world, if you think this USA is so bad and try to not be surprised when you return and kiss the ground and thank your lucky stars that you have that passport and are a Citizen of the wonderful USA!…. :(
Dd
Don’t quit and let the bastards win. That’s what they want. At some point we need to stand up and fight to recapture our dreams again. Both Dems and Reps have it wrong and we need change.
Never give up on your personal dreams,
Currently Trump is the only person running that may be able to save our GREAT Country
I wish you would stop using the 4.9% unemployment rate that the Obama administration likes to tout. It is not the truth, it is the U3 number which only shows those whose unemployment insurance has expired. Look at the BLS number for January, the U6 number, which is 10.5%. This number includes those who are chronically unemployed or those who are forced to take a low paying part-time job instead of the full time, higher paying position they are qualified for. While we’re at it, please note that the jobs numbers are phony, too. When a person loses a full time job and has to take 2 or 3 part-time jobs to survive, the feds count all 3 jobs as full time new jobs.
Glass Stegall was in 1934 and I was 6 my farther had a business with 8 employees he never knew about this law because his business was making and selling lawn sprinkers. I had a great life then. People were knocking at the door.