|
If you believe what central banks say and you plan your investments accordingly, you could be in for some big surprises.
Consider, for example, some of the lies spouting forth from the U.S. Fed and the European Central Bank (ECB) …
Lie #1
The Fed Should Aim to Create “At Least Some” Inflation
To justify its latest round of quantitative easing, the Federal Reserve has made the case that inflation in small doses is good … even if larger doses are obviously bad.
In reality …
- No economist has ever presented a shred of evidence that establishes the dividing line is between “a little good inflation” and “a lot of bad inflation.”
- Moreover, no economist can deny that inflation almost always feeds on itself, as each player in marketplaces seeks to gain an advantage over the other, jacking up prices in a leapfrog fashion.
- Indeed, past experience proves that rampant, out-of-control inflation almost invariably starts with small brushfires and then escalates into major conflagrations, and
- Any central banker who denies these realities is merely compounding the first lie with still another.
Lie #2
Modern Central Banks Pursue “Price Stability”
Every central bank pays lip service to price stability as its core mission and goal, but most are surprisingly quick to make a wide range of excuses when that goal slips them by.
Case in point: The European Central Bank (ECB) swears that its goal is to keep price inflation capped at 2 percent per year. But last week, the inflation rate in the euro zone busted through that threshold at 2.2 percent, the highest in two years.
And still, they talk unabashedly about price stability.
Think about that for a moment. If prices rise 2 percent each year, they will jump nearly 22 percent after ten years with compounding.
After 20 years, prices will be up 48.6 percent, and at a 2.2 percent annual rate, they’ll be up by 54.5 percent. That’s not exactly price stability.
Isn’t it strange — no, cheeky and reckless — to define a one-third-or-more loss in your wealth as “price stability”? Of course it is. But it’s part of the central banking community’s dirty little secret.
Let me remind you that the U.S. Fed and other central banks are no better than the ECB, often even worse. And in our globalized world with monetary and fiscal “crisis management” so synchronized, inflation is a global phenomenon.
Indeed, a few months ago, inflation started to rear its ugly head in China and other emerging nations. Now it has reached Europe. And it’s only a matter of time before it hits U.S. shores. So everything I am writing here is equally pertinent to the U.S.
Lie #3
Economic Growth Drives Prices Higher
This was the recent headline in a major German newspaper commenting on the higher European and German inflation rates.
The intent was to put a positive spin on the higher inflation, directly associating it with positive growth, and it’s exactly what modern central bankers want you to believe.
Don’t fall for it.
To understand why, go back to a couple of basic definitions of inflation.
The first definition:
Inflation is the increase in the general level of prices of goods and services in an economy over a period of time.
True, but this is merely a description. It tells you nothing about what causes rising prices. So if you rely exclusively on this definition, you are more likely to fall for the argument that it’s all driven by economic growth or some other easy-to-blame — supposedly “temporary” — factor like rising energy and food prices.
So while formally correct, this definition isn’t very helpful. It hides more than it clarifies.
The second definition:
Inflation is the increase in the money supply in an economy over a period of time.
Now, we’re getting down to the heart of the matter: This definition makes it clear that rising prices are merely a symptom of the true inflation — the expansion in the money supply. And it also makes it immediately clear that the primary culprit for rising inflation is the entity in charge of that money supply — the central bank.
Coming to the Truth
Now, when measured by this criteria — expanding money supply —the true role of central banks is unmasked. Instead of inflation fighters, they are revealed as inflation mongers.
Indeed, history shows that sustained inflation — let alone rampant or hyperinflation — has never been possible without a huge increase in the money supply. And common sense tells you that it will never be possible in the future either.
What, then, gives politicians and central bankers the cover to perpetuate their lies?
The answer is time lags!
It takes time for expanding money supply to feed through the economy and create inflation.
And sometimes, as in recent history, money supply growth leads to rising prices in sectors that are not adequately reflected in consumer price indices — like stocks in the late 1990s and real estate in the early 2000s.
Some of the best evidence on the importance of money supply lies in the studies of historical inflations conducted by Swiss economist and monetary expert Peter Bernholz in his book Monetary Regimes and Inflation.
His findings:
- All major inflations have been caused by princes or governments.
- All hyperinflations have occurred in the presence of “discretionary money regimes” — in other words, when central banks had the freedom to run the printing presses.
- Hyperinflations are always caused by public budget deficits which are largely financed by money creation. If inflation accelerates, these budget deficits tend to increase.
On the Path to High Official Inflation Rates
Please consider the above findings very seriously because they are a far more accurate description of our current monetary and fiscal environment than anything you will hear from the Fed or other central banks.
So it’s no coincidence that consumer price inflation has started to creep up. It’s exactly what our politicians have ordered when they decided that you, the taxpayer, should be handed the bill for the sins of reckless bankers and real estate speculators.
With Fed Chairman Ben Bernanke the world’s leader of “modern central banking” …
With governments all over the world on a debt binge …
And with still more of the same in the pipeline …
You had better brace yourself for more inflation.
How to Protect Yourself and Profit
From Higher Inflation Rates
One of the first markets to respond to present and future inflation is the bond market. Bond investors foresee inflation driving interest rates higher. They don’t want to get stuck in fixed, low-yielding bonds. And they sell.
So here’s what to do.
First, get rid of your long-term bonds. They are definitely not the place to be in inflationary times. And with rates as they are now, long-term Treasury bonds look very risky.
Indeed, right now, long-term interest rates actually seem to be in the process of forming a huge bottom formation. The decades-long trend of declining interest rates which began in 1981 is probably turning around. A new bull market in interest rates (bear market in bond prices) is now beginning.
Second, if your portfolio or your business are vulnerable to higher interest rates, you should hedge. In the past, there was little you could do other than run for cover. Fortunately, however, in today’s markets you can protect yourself with ETFs like ProShares UltraShort 20+ Year, symbol TBT, designed to rise 2 percent for every 1 percent decline in bond prices.
Third, if you have funds you can afford to risk, consider ETFs like TBT as a vehicle to profit directly from rising interest rates.
Fourth, if you haven’t done so already, learn more about the dangers and opportunities ahead in my just-published book, The Global Debt Trap. Click on your choice of bookseller to order it online — Amazon, Barnes & Noble or Books-A-Million or stop by your nearest bookstore.
Best wishes,
Claus
{ 11 comments }
Claus danka i read your book and are taking necessary precautions to prevent my family from suffering in these unchartered economic times i simply buy precious metals . The opium optisium people want to believe i is a fantasy none of my friends listen or take action its amazing keep up the good work.
TLT will move with bond prices and drop as bond yields rise. It moves inversely with TBT . I don’t believe it will rise with falling bond prices and rising yields.
Dear Sir:
I follow your and the various Money and Markets posting and have for some time. I feel it is important to comment on Protect Yourself from Central Bank Lies!, Wednesday, January 19, 2011 at 7:30 am. I agree that we can trust Central Banks or Central Bankers lip service. The most recent set of lies coming out of the Federal Reserve and European Central Banks are even more particularly disturbing. I believe Martin post discussed the move to international currency and central bank which appears to be one of the motives behind the scenes. I would like to suggest you definition of inflation does not ring correct in the historical perspective. Rather, inflation indicates to many dollars chasing to few goods. At this time we are not seeing this Stores have to much inventory yet prices are increasing. On a second point; While I have not read Peter Bernholz book but will very soon I would like to point out this point Central Banks are not Government and as the Federal Reserve has said over and over again in various ways do not answer to Government. So when you or Peter Bernholz says government has created inflation I thinks a logical disconnect happens. For instance what government voted for QE1 or QE2, or who controls it issue of check money which comprises approx. 95% of the money in circulation. I would like to point you to the American Monetary Institute site and book called the Lost Science of Money, Stephen Zarlenga for a well documented historical perspective of money and its creation. http://www.monetary.org/
For your consideration
Fred Montano
As always, I enjoy your incisive analysis, however, I think it is important to explain why Central Banks are pushed into this position of dishonesty.
I read in the Financial Times the following article about America’s debt problems:
http://www.ft.com/cms/s/0/31dbce8a-1f52-11e0-8c1c-00144feab49a.html#axzz1ATvVGKyt
Here is a frigtening quote from that article, “According to a report issued last month by an 18-member bipartisan commission on fiscal responsibility, by 2025 tax revenues will be sufficient to finance only interest payments”
Clearly America’s debt problem is totally out of control. And there are only three methods of resolving this crisis. Increase taxes, which Republicans refuse to co-operate on, or reduce expenditures -the 800 pound Gorrilla being Social Security and Healthcare, not to mention the gargantuan military budget, which neither Republicans or Democrats will co-operate on.
This leaves the third and final solution: monetize the debt. Which is exactly what you describe in your article. Print more money and create inflation and pay off those debts with worthless paper. Yes, its incredibly destructive. Yes, it punishes savers at the expense of the profligate, and yes it will probably destroy the economy in the same way that Leukemia kills a human patient, but that’s the Achilles Heal of our democracies. Ask our political leaders to lead responsibly and they will take the least path of resistance.
There is only thing people can do to protect themselves in such extreme environments, educate themselves and take advantage of the situation.
Nice job, Claus!
Claus,
As always, I’ve enjoyed this article. I can’t agree more with you on the destructive influence of inflation. I am a little confused by your recommendation of TLT. Are you recommended shorting it, or buying it after a substantial price plunge, or something else?
TLT or TBT? I see Claus Mentioning TBT, But I don’t see a mention of TLT…
Claus,
I agree with you about how destructive inflation is to an economy. I just don’t see how we are going to have much of it in the near future. Despite all the new money in the M2, there is no demand for credit, due to unfavorable demographics, and too much credit market debt not connected to any positive cashflow. The high unemployment and weak recovery in the job market are keeping the velocity of money from expanding. The only inflation we are getting is mostly in commodities, and it’s probably driven by speculation, not a demand pull.
Hello Claus thanks for your article!
I know a third definition of inflation,and i really wonder your thoughts on this:
“Inflation is a net expansion of money and credit, with credit marked to market.”
Those who think prices are what matters, even those who have no debt and no assets, are simply missing the boat about the importance of credit expansion and credit contraction in fiat credit-based financial system. As shown above, a credit contraction affects everyone, in many ways, and in far more important ways than simple price changes.
The stimulus and bailouts helped the financial economy (for a while), but not the real economy. Because credit dwarfs money supply, trillions of dollars of so-called stimulus vanished into thin air, with no lasting impact on the jobs market.
The inflationists and hperinflationists who ignored credit and focused on money supply alone (or consumer prices) never saw the plunge in interest rates coming or the massive pounding in global equity markets.
…In credit-based system, especially where credit dwarf money supply, credit itself (and the value of credit marked-to-market on the balance sheets of banks) is of paramount importance.
Those who insist inflation is about prices, as well as those who view inflation as an increase in money supply alone (ignoring credit), are going to continue to get the economic picture wrong.
If you are focused on prices or money supply alone, you are focused on the wrong thing.
In a fiat credit-based economy, where credit dwarfs money supply, changes in credit is what’s important, not changes in money supply, not nominal changes in prices.
It’s as simple as that.
http://globaleconomicanalysis.blogspot.com/2010/09/myths-about-whats-economically.html
and
Inflation: What the heck is it?
http://globaleconomicanalysis.blogspot.com/2006/02/inflation-what-heck-is-it.html
Claus,
I am an FX professional based in Australasia.
I recently bought your book “The Global Debt Trap” and thought it was very well written !
When you talk about inflation, do you have time frame to share with us before things really get difficult ? Also, you talk about Inverse Bond ETFs, but I have no idea which one(s) to invest in. Are you able to advise me here as I am unsure of a good issuer which you have emphasized in your book to be very important ?
Finally, on a scale of 1-10 just how bad do you think this is going to get ?
Please feel free to email me direct.
Thanks
Regards,
Vincent
Whatever is going in the world economy, without the FED’s QE, it would be worse – symptom-wise. But the credit-fuelled illness will still rage on, until everybody accepts that we cannot take on credit that we are unable to pay off in the long term or the central banks just burn the credit with hyperinflation. As Fred Montano pointed out, FED isn’t or better should not be under control of the government, just like the ECB is independent from the EU and all of its countries. The real question is, to what extent. The FED isn’t a typical central bank as I get it, it’s rather an independent joint venture of U.S. bankers. Bankers who are financing the election campaigns of politicians who make decisions about how much money printed by the FED should the U.S. Treasury issue as bonds.