Money and Markets - Financial Advice | Financial Investment Newsletter
Skip to content
  • Home
  • Experts
    • Martin D. Weiss, Ph.D.
    • Mike Burnick
    • Sean Brodrick
    • JR Crooks
    • Larry Edelson
    • Bill Hall
    • Mike Larson
    • Jon Markman
    • Mandeep Rai
    • Tony Sagami
    • Grant Wasylik
    • Guest Contributors
      • Amber Dakar
      • Peter Schiff
      • John Sheely
      • Claus Vogt
  • Blog
  • Resources
    • FAQ
    • Personal Finance Corner
      • Hot Tips
      • Investments
      • Money & Banking
      • Consumer Loans
      • College Savings
      • Retirement
      • Credit & Debt
      • Taxes
      • Insurance
      • Life & Home
      • Investment Portfolios
    • Links
  • Services
    • Premium Membership Services 
      • Money and Markets Inner Circle
    • Trading Services
      • Marijuana Millionaire
      • Tech Trend Trader
      • Calendar Profits Trader
      • E-Wave Trader
      • Money and Markets’ Natural Resource Investor
      • Money and Markets’ Natural Resource Options Alerts
      • Supercycle Investor
      • Wall Street Front Runner
      • Pivotal Point Trader
    • Investment Newsletters
      • Real Wealth Report
      • Safe Money
      • Disruptors and Dominators
      • The Power Elite
    • Books
      • The Ultimate Depression Survival Guide
      • Investing Without Fear
      • The Standard & Poor’s Guide for the New Investor
      • The Ultimate Safe Money Guide
    • Public Service
  • Media
    • Press Releases
    • Money and Markets in the News
    • Media Archive
  • Issues
    • 2017 Issues
    • 2016 Issues
    • 2015 Issues
    • 2014 Issues
    • 2013 Issues
    • 2012 Issues
    • 2011 Issues
    • 2010 Issues
    • 2009 Issues
    • 2008 Issues
    • 2007 Issues
  • Subscriber Login
  • Weiss Education

Money and Markets: Investing Insights

So Which Market Is “Getting it Wrong?”

Nilus Mattive | Tuesday, August 23, 2011 at 7:30 am

Nilus Mattive

Last week, Mike Larson did a great job of outlining some of the problems facing the global economy … and there’s no doubt they’re pretty big hurdles.

This explains why we saw yet another week of massive volatility, and some truly unprecedented moves in the major markets that I follow.

For example, yields on 10-year U.S. Treasuries hit an all-time low — a mind-boggling figure of less than 2 percent!

Meanwhile, after a brief period of calm, stocks plummeted all over again.

While the action is disconcerting to a lot of investors, I do want to point out that every time stocks sell off, the yields on dividend payers only become more attractive — especially when you compare them to those paltry Treasury yields.

In fact, at least 80 percent of the S&P 500 index’s dividend stocks are currently yielding MORE than 10-year Treasuries!

It’s perverse, when you stop and plot it out:

First, the U.S. government’s credit worthiness got downgraded …

Then, in reaction, investors mercilessly punished American companies — many of whom are sitting on their biggest cash hoards in history, and have the cleanest balance sheets of their corporate lives …

All while GORGING THEMSELVES on the very securities that got downgraded in a so-called “flight to safety!”

I realize that there are other forces at work beyond just the fallout from S&P’s U.S. downgrade and the debt ceiling debacle — namely, the strong possibility that we’re heading back into recession.

But let’s put that aside for a moment since the recession is bad for both the government’s debt situation and companies’ profit prospects.

Now let’s imagine that rather than downgrading the U.S., S&P came out and downgraded ALL of America’s biggest corporations instead.

Do you think that investors would run from Treasuries and pile into stocks?

No way!

So, on the surface, this seems like one of those ‘heads I win, tails you lose’ kind of situations.

Or, as one astute reader basically asked me, “Who has it wrong right now — the stock market or the credit market?”

My Answer Is That BOTH Markets Are At Least Partially Wrong …

Before I go further, let’s hang it all out there: You could certainly just go to all cash (or gold) and avoid the debate altogether. However, I don’t consider either approach entirely safe … especially for someone who’s looking to generate income in retirement.

A big cash position? Fine. A lot of gold? Okay, as long as you’re willing to ride out volatility there.

Still, let’s assume you want to allocate some part of your portfolio to the traditional investment assets (stocks and bonds) …

I’ve heard other experts basically describe the entire financial system as a tall building, with “safer” investments like Treasuries at the foundation and “riskier” assets like stocks at the top.

Based on this classic logic, even though Treasuries were downgraded … there is greater overall risk to the stuff at the top. And with Warren Buffett recently saying that the U.S.’s credit rating should still be “quadruple A,” you might be inclined to just accept this explanation.

In reality I don’t believe things line up quite so nicely — not these days.

I can see why, despite the problems in the U.S., Treasuries can still be considered among the paper assets with the highest potential for capital preservation … largely because of the dollar’s status as the world’s reserve currency.

That assumes you hold them to maturity, of course. And it does NOT consider the effects of inflation during the time you’re holding, which is ultimately what we’re implying by saying that Washington can just save the system by printing enough money.

So, in that respect, I think investors have been extremely foolish for piling into Treasuries lately — especially BECAUSE the Fed virtually guaranteed rock-bottom rates for another two years.

Advertisement

Meanwhile, I also think many stock prices should have moved lower in response to signs of a new recession — though not because of the U.S. credit downgrade nor the political environment.

However, I wouldn’t paint all stocks the same color.

In fact, I would argue that conservative, cash-rich dividend stocks are clearly the better alternative right now.

Like bonds, they will likely provide solid income throughout another recession and during this unprecedented volatility.

Unlike bonds:

  • They are providing GOOD yields — and not just good on a relative basis, but on a broad historical basis in many cases …
  • They are backed by entities with solid financials and cash piles, some with higher credit ratings than the U.S. government …
  • Plus, their payments can continue rising as you hold them!

What about the obvious risk that further market declines will wipe out your payments and then some?

That is definitely a risk, even though dividend payers typically hold up better than most.

Yet you have exactly the same risk when you invest in Treasuries, especially via mutual funds or ETFs. And the longer your time horizon, the less of a concern this becomes.

Bottom line: Investors have been absolutely crazy to pile into Treasuries. I also think they have been wrong to sell off solid dividend stocks of recession-resistant companies. And I feel that there is a big opportunity right now for those of us who understand where the “wrongs” of these two markets intersect.

Best wishes,

Nilus

P.S. My next issue of Income Superstars will be going to press this week, and I plan on issuing new recommendations to take advantage of the madness I just described. So if you’re not yet on board, I encourage you to watch my latest strategy video and consider joining us right away. Heck, a full year will cost you just $39! Click here now for all the details.

Nilus Mattive has been obsessed with dividend-paying stocks since the sixth grade. And after graduating from college, he began working for Jono Steinberg's Individual Investor Group, where he wrote a regular investment column. Later, Nilus spent five years at Standard & Poor's editing the company's flagship investment newsletter, The Outlook. During that time, Nilus also penned his first finance book, The Standard & Poor's Guide for the New Investor. These days, Nilus loves telling investors about dividend-paying stocks in his monthly newsletter, Income Superstars.

{ 4 comments }

Scott Tuesday, August 23, 2011 at 11:42 am

Nilus,

I completely agree with your analysis. When I heard of the government downgrade, I really could not understand why stocks were being punished and bonds were being bought. What should have happened is that the “stock” (i.e. bonds) of the U.S. government, which is basically another corporation with a poor balance sheet, should have been sold. And the stock of solid companies with good balance sheets, especially dividend payers, should have been bought. Oh well, good for us, huh? I don’t mind buying more stock of solid dividend-paying companies for the long term at a cheaper price. :)

Scott

The John Tuesday, August 23, 2011 at 5:06 pm

If you have a couple of million $, higher priced dividend stocks make sense. For the smaller investor, not. $100,000 is not going to give you any meaningful dividend income. Nilus, you should address that.

Nilus Wednesday, August 24, 2011 at 11:36 am

Sounds like a great topic for a future column … thanks, John!

Nilus

The John Friday, August 26, 2011 at 12:09 pm

You’re welcome.

Previous post: Failures Projected as Mortgage Insurers Struggle

Next post: Russia: The Next Big Winner in Resource Riches

  • Sign Up Free

    To receive editorial updates from The Weiss Center for Investor Advancement and Money and Markets, type in your email address. We respect your privacy

  • About Us
  • FAQ
  • Legal
  • Privacy
  • Whitelist
  • Advertising
  • Contact Us
  • ©2025 Money and Markets - Financial Advice | Financial Investment Newsletter.
Weiss Research
Weiss Research, Inc., founded in 1971, has a long history of providing research and analysis designed to empower investors with information and tools to make more informed, independent decisions along with an equally long history of public service. [More »]