Money and Markets - Financial Advice | Financial Investment Newsletter
Skip to content
  • Home
  • Experts
    • Martin D. Weiss, Ph.D.
    • Mike Burnick
    • Sean Brodrick
    • JR Crooks
    • Larry Edelson
    • Bill Hall
    • Mike Larson
    • Jon Markman
    • Mandeep Rai
    • Tony Sagami
    • Grant Wasylik
    • Guest Contributors
      • Amber Dakar
      • Peter Schiff
      • John Sheely
      • Claus Vogt
  • Blog
  • Resources
    • FAQ
    • Personal Finance Corner
      • Hot Tips
      • Investments
      • Money & Banking
      • Consumer Loans
      • College Savings
      • Retirement
      • Credit & Debt
      • Taxes
      • Insurance
      • Life & Home
      • Investment Portfolios
    • Links
  • Services
    • Premium Membership Services 
      • Money and Markets Inner Circle
    • Trading Services
      • Marijuana Millionaire
      • Tech Trend Trader
      • Calendar Profits Trader
      • E-Wave Trader
      • Money and Markets’ Natural Resource Investor
      • Money and Markets’ Natural Resource Options Alerts
      • Supercycle Investor
      • Wall Street Front Runner
      • Pivotal Point Trader
    • Investment Newsletters
      • Real Wealth Report
      • Safe Money
      • Disruptors and Dominators
      • The Power Elite
    • Books
      • The Ultimate Depression Survival Guide
      • Investing Without Fear
      • The Standard & Poor’s Guide for the New Investor
      • The Ultimate Safe Money Guide
    • Public Service
  • Media
    • Press Releases
    • Money and Markets in the News
    • Media Archive
  • Issues
    • 2017 Issues
    • 2016 Issues
    • 2015 Issues
    • 2014 Issues
    • 2013 Issues
    • 2012 Issues
    • 2011 Issues
    • 2010 Issues
    • 2009 Issues
    • 2008 Issues
    • 2007 Issues
  • Subscriber Login
  • Weiss Education

Money and Markets: Investing Insights

Why “Tapering” Will Not Go Smoothly — and What That Means for Bonds and Stocks

Mike Larson | Friday, August 9, 2013 at 7:30 am

Mike Larson

If you buy the party line that Wall Street and the Federal Reserve is pushing, the process of “tapering” back on Quantitative Easing (QE) will be relatively painless. All the Fed has to do is gradually, slowly, predictably, and gently ease back on its bond purchases and, they say, it will have minimal market impact.

My take? Fuhgeddaboudit … it will be anything but smooth. And this week, I’ll use the Fed’s own comments — and a shocking Fed chart — to show you why.

First, some background.

QE is unlike anything the Fed has previously done in the last century. It was an untested, fly-by-the-seat-of-the-pants policy when policymakers rolled it out in the midst of 2008’s full-scale credit market emergency. No one at the Fed — or anywhere else — had any idea what the long-term consequences would be. But they did it anyway because they had nothing else up their sleeve.

That made it inherently risky from the start. Things went okay for a while, which encouraged the Fed to keep at it … despite the fact the “real” economy didn’t respond all that much.

But beginning this spring, everything started to change. In fact, the last few QE and QE-like moves that overseas central banks have tried have utterly backfired.

Take Japan.

An initial pop in Japanese stocks due to that country’s massive QE effort has now resulted in some of the worst declines — and crazy volatility — in several years.  In just two recent weeks, for instance, Nikkei 225 futures plunged more than 3,300 points. That was a whopping 21 percent move! Swings of several hundred points have become the norm rather than the exception since then.

xxxxx
Massive QE in countries such as Japan has caused huge swings in their stock markets.

Another move this week by the Bank of England is also backfiring. New BOE Governor Mark Carney pledged to keep monetary policy easy until unemployment there drops below 7 percent, a form of forward guidance that was designed to mimic Fed moves here. He also said the BOE could ramp up its $574 billion QE program.

But rather than drive the British currency down and bond prices up, the announcement had the exact opposite effect. That marked the second time in the past few months that monetary policy not only failed completely … it actually hurt the very markets it was supposed to help.

So to recap: You have an untested, emergency program that wasn’t allowed to die after the emergency faded, despite the possibility of significant long-term consequences. And you have key evidence over the past few months that QE overseas is backfiring.

That brings me to the quotes and chart I mentioned at the outset. They come from Dallas Fed President Richard Fisher.

He noted in a speech a few days ago that the Fed is now basically buying every mortgage backed security the industry is issuing … as well as others being sold by third parties. Not only that, the Fed has jettisoned virtually all of its highly liquid, easy-to-sell short-term Treasuries … and hoovered up more than one-fifth of all the long-term Treasuries on the market.

His conclusion:

“The point is: We own a significant slice of these critical markets. This is, indeed, something of a Gordian Knot.”

You can read more about the Gordian Knot legend here. Suffice it to say, Fisher’s reference is shorthand for an intractable situation that’s virtually impossible to get out of.

This stunning chart — from the very same presentation — makes it clear what kind of trap the Fed has created for itself. It shows that the Fed’s balance sheet is nearing a whopping $3.7 trillion — by far the greatest as a percentage of GDP in the history of the country. That compares to about $880 billion back in 2008 before the credit crisis.

Click for larger version

When you consider the massive increase in the size of the balance sheet … and the fact the Fed has effectively “cornered” key portions of the bond market … you can only come to one conclusion. Untying this Gordian Knot won’t be easy. In fact, it could prove to be an epic disaster.

Even the mere mention of a possible future tapering of QE caused key parts of the bond market to suffer their worst declines since the credit market collapse of 2008. So when the actual tapering begins — possibly as early as next month — look out! That’s going to lead to some real market chaos … but also some potentially HUGE profit opportunities for properly positioned investors.

I’ll have much more on that in the days and weeks ahead. But the spot-on advice about bonds I’ve been issuing for the past year — to stay the heck away from long-term Treasuries, municipals, junk bonds, and emerging market debt — still stands.

As for your stocks, stay tuned. With QE backfiring in Japan … backfiring in the U.K. … and on its last legs here in the U.S. … things could get very interesting in the weeks ahead. I’ve been lightening up and taking profits on many stocks, and I remain wary of the possibility of a sharp and potentially deep correction.

In fact, I’ve been recommending select, inverse ETFs that rise in value when sectors like REITs fall. That recommendation is now starting to pay off. I say that because the benchmark REIT ETF, the iShares U.S. Real Estate ETF (IYR), just gave up every single penny of its 2013 gains this week — and looks to be carving out a massive head and shoulders top on the charts.

Bottom line: Do not expect the tapering process to go smoothly. Significant bumps and stumbles are likely, for bonds and stocks alike.

Until next time,

Mike

Mike Larson

Mike Larson graduated from Boston University with a B.S. degree in Journalism and a B.A. degree in English in 1998, and went to work for Bankrate.com. There, he learned the mortgage and interest rates markets inside and out. Mike then joined Weiss Research in 2001. He is the editor of Safe Money Report. He is often quoted by the Washington Post, Reuters, Dow Jones Newswires, Orlando Sentinel, Palm Beach Post and Sun-Sentinel, and he has appeared on CNN, Bloomberg Television and CNBC.

{ 3 comments }

Dana Blankenhorn Friday, August 9, 2013 at 5:42 pm

Money that sits in a vault, that's not employed in the market, isn't money, and we can't just let the economy rot because some money hoarder wants to pretend it is. When Aladdin arrived in Baghdad with the wealth of the cave, people trying to sell rings in pawn shops got less for their merchandise. That's because he then put money into the marketplace.

Pamela Bell Tuesday, August 13, 2013 at 9:22 pm

Is there any validity to the notion that the market has already factored in the effect of taperingt QE?

Money And Markets Wednesday, August 14, 2013 at 1:32 pm

No, I do not believe the market has priced in the tapering (and eventual “cold turkey” end of QE). We have been living on an artificial sugar high for the past few years in the bond market, and the May-June unwinding is just a partial repealing of that move. Much more pain lies ahead, in my view. –Mike

Previous post: Positive Economic Surprises for the Economy, But the Details Look Dismal

Next post: The Most Surprising Surge in Interest Rates in 100 Years

  • Sign Up Free

    To receive editorial updates from The Weiss Center for Investor Advancement and Money and Markets, type in your email address. We respect your privacy

  • About Us
  • FAQ
  • Legal
  • Privacy
  • Whitelist
  • Advertising
  • Contact Us
  • ©2025 Money and Markets - Financial Advice | Financial Investment Newsletter.
Weiss Research
Weiss Research, Inc., founded in 1971, has a long history of providing research and analysis designed to empower investors with information and tools to make more informed, independent decisions along with an equally long history of public service. [More »]