You should know that I read all the comments about my articles posted on the Money and Markets site. Your input helps me understand what’s important to you and helps guide me in creating content that’s valuable to you as I consider future articles.
In response to last week’s submission, where I pointed out the disconnect between the Wall Street analysts’ consensus estimate of earnings growth this year as compared with the world’s best economists’ views of this year’s GDP growth, Jerry posted the following:
Your analysis of the markets is straightforward and easy to digest. The data that you provide is very useful for the average investor. Keep up the good work. Thanks.
Jerry’s spot on, I write these articles to keep it simple for the everyday investor so you protect and grow your nest egg, not as ivory-tower treatises for my snooty colleagues on Wall Street.
That’s because, as I pointed out in my March 24, 2017 Money and Markets article, it was the great investor John Bogle of Vanguard Group fame, who introduced me to the centuries-old wisdom of Occam’s Razor which says: The simpler the solution, the more likely it is to be correct.
Every Tool, Every Rating, Every Analyst Report – We’ve provided ratings and analysis tools covering stocks, ETFs, mutual funds, banks, insurers, and more for 28 years. But we’ve NEVER given investors access to all of those proprietary products free … until now! Between May 8 and May 14, you’ll have the chance to test drive absolutely everything you need to find the best, most fundamentally sound investments in the market. All you need to do is click here to register, then be ready to go Monday, May 8 at 9 a.m. Eastern Time. See you then! |
And John’s advice has enabled me to make a lot of money for my private clients over the years.
Wall Street has a long history of creating schemes designed to separate unwitting investors from their money. |
That’s because as a 30-year Wall Street veteran – I know that Wall Street has a long history of creating schemes cloaked in complexity – primarily for the purpose of separating unwitting investors from their money. So getting down to the essence of things can help you turn the tables on the big boys and can give you a distinct advantage over everyone else.
That’s why – inspired by Jerry’s comments and John’s guidance – I am now going to introduce you to another simple, yet powerful and elegant model for dissecting the stock market. And better yet, for projecting future stock market returns — that no one in the mainstream media, on the Internet, or probably your own financial adviser is telling you about.
This model can clear away the complexity surrounding the stock market and consequently lead to great financial reward. And, yes, you can use it to project future returns on the stock market as well as individual stocks.
Applied properly, it’s a real money maker!
In a perfect world, you want a stock forecasting model that is easy-to-understand, accurate and complete. And that’s what we have here.
So without further ado, here it is…
There are three – that’s right, only three — factors that determine the returns from stocks. And they are:
- Beginning Dividend Yield.
- Earnings Growth Rate (Annual % change in Earnings-Per-Share).
- Revaluation (Annual % Change in Price-to-Earnings Ratio).
All three factors are expressed as a percentage, and best of all, you simply add up the factors – and presto – out pops the total return for the stock market as a whole or for an individual stock.
What’s this model telling us now?
Referring back to my article last week, if you believe the Wall Street analysts, stock returns for 2017 will look something like this:
That’s because the Trump administration’s plan to jumpstart the U.S. economy, with its Four Trump Cards that I told you about in my January 20, Money and Markets article, is hitting on all cylinders and the reflation trade in back on.
On the other hand, it you think the World Bank’s, International Monetary Fund’s and our very own Federal Reserve’s economists have it right, then here’s a reasonable estimate of this year’s stock market returns.
That’s because, in this scenario, global deflationary pressures win out and earnings-growth projections come in at a very disappointing level.
It’s the Battle of the Financial World’s Titans: Analysts versus Economists.
If you are with the analysts, then buy the ETF QQQ or its leveraged cousin QLD (for supercharged returns) because growth will rule the day and the stock market will soar.
If you are like me and you side with the economists – at least in the short run – then get your stock market hedges on and buy the ETFs TLT and GLD because when earnings undershoot, it will be “look-out-below” for the stock market – although I expect that period to be brief.
As the Captain of the Safe Money ship, my job is to avoid the wipeout so that my subscribers can protect and grow their wealth.
And, in the current environment, there is more downside risk in the financial markets than the potential for an upside surprise. That’s why I continue to have the hedges on in the Safe Money Portfolio while maintaining a core position in 12 carefully selected best-of-breed growth stocks – each with the potential to earn double-digit returns this year.
Next Friday, I’ll explain in more detail how you can use the simple and robust three-factor model I’ve shared with you today to make your own projections for the stock market as well as individual stocks.
Specifically, I’ll pull back the curtain and show you how to estimate the mysterious third factor of our three-factor model, Revaluation. Plus, I’ll explain why the first factor, Beginning Dividend Yield, is known before we even start to make our projections.
Best wishes,
Bill Hall
P.S. Did you know sin stocks can turn $10,000 into a $1 million windfall? You can still buy these intriguing stocks for a song — a thousand shares for $1,000, $500, in some cases, even as little as $250. And if history proves anything, it’s that paying pocket change to buy rogue companies on the launching pad can produce truly amazing profits. Recently, for example, one of these sin stocks garnered a lot of media attention by suddenly exploding in price. If you had invested $1,000, you could have walked away with nearly $100,000. Click here to read more now!
{ 5 comments }
Something to consider regarding the effect of lower corporate tax rates on forward earnings. I recently saw that corporate debt levels and debt service are now at record high levels, which is to be expected in the low interest rate environment that has prevailed now for many years. Any rise in interest rates will have a significant effect on debt service levels and eat away at the expected after-tax earnings boost from lower corporate taxes. That effect will not be seen immediately but can be projected to occur over the average remaining maturity of existing low interest debt as it is rolled over into higher interest debt. I am almost wondering if the move toward lower corporate tax rates is not at least partially motivated by this anticipated rise in corporate debt service levels as interest rates are raised over the coming years. We need to keep in mind that, with a current interest rate of, say for example, 4%, a rise to 5% would over time increase debt service by 25%, and a rise to 6% would raise debt service by 50%. Big effects on bottom line and PE.
Analyst or academic, what the “estimates” are based on is rarely made explicit.
The basis for the forecast should be defined, and phrased in the future perfect tense–if this or that occurs, then the forecasted earnings growth rate “will have been achieved”.
Bill
You suggested using a 20 year treasury bond ETF (TNT) as a hedge for a market downturn. Have you factored in the effect of Janet Yellen’s intent to downsize the Fed’s 4.5 Trillion balance sheet? It seems that reintroducing this inventory of treasury bonds back into the bond market could adversely affect the value of 20 year treasury bonds.
It would be nice to see some of the stocks the model identifies as top choices. it would be the best if you walked us through the steps.
Looking forward with great anticipation. Thanks for your valuable concern on our behalf.
Hi Bill,
Within the last two weeks you sent a Money & Markets report that directed me to a Bill Hall “Sin stock page for five marijuana stocks”.
It offered this under a Safe Money Report & Real Wealth Report package for $29.
Before purchasing I went to both reports as I’m currently a subscriber to both but could not find anything regarding these Sin Stocks….so I purchased the $29 offer to get this information.
Should I have just sent you an email instead saying I was interested? Is this alternate form of buying more services increasing my months of membership in both research papers?
Help & Thanks,
Jim